NCT02858284TerminatedNot Applicable
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, 8-week Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the TUG (Therapeutic Ultrasound for Glaucoma) Compared to Sham in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
EyeSonix0 sites25 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Terminated
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 25
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in mean diurnal IOP
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the TUG device is safe and effective in patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •At least 18 years of age
- •Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in both eyes
- •Be willing to discontinue disallowed products and/or medications during the period indicated prior to participation or throughout the study
- •Be willing to provide written informed consent
- •Be willing and able to follow instructions
- •A negative urine pregnancy test and agree to an acceptable form of contraception for the duration of the study (if female of childbearing potential)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Any form of glaucoma other than primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in either eye
- •Prior or anticipated concurrent use of an investigational drug or device
- •Be currently pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy; or be a woman that has a positive pregnancy test
- •Have a condition (ocular or systemic) or a situation which, in the Investigator's opinion, may put the subject at increased risk, may confound study data, or may interfere significantly with the subject's study participation
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in mean diurnal IOP
Time Frame: Week 4 (Visit 5) and Week 8 (Visit 7)
Change in mean IOP
Time Frame: through subject study completion; average 2 months
Change in IOP from baseline
Time Frame: through subject study completion; average 2 months
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Investigation of GT UrologIcal, LLC's Artificial Urinary Sphincter (RELIEF II)Male Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT02288455GT Urological, LLC80
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Tunnel PICC Guided by EDUG and Conventional PICCthe Incidence of PICC-related ComplicationsNCT05621473Shandong Branden Med.Device Co.,Ltd420
Completed
Phase 3
EZ-2053 in the Prophylaxis of Acute Pulmonary Allograft RejectionChronic Obstructive PulmonaryPulmonary Vascular DiseaseCystic FibrosisIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisBronchiectasisNCT00105183Neovii Biotech223
Completed
Phase 2
Phase 2 Study of TD-9855 to Treat FibromyalgiaFibromyalgiaNCT01693692Theravance Biopharma392
Completed
Phase 3
A Research Study Looking at How a Factor VIII Medicine Called Turoctocog Alfa Pegol (N8-GP) Works in People With Haemophilia ACongenital Bleeding DisorderHaemophilia ANCT03528551Novo Nordisk A/S160
