Loteprednol vs Prednisolone for the Treatment of Intraocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children.
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01475643
- Lead Sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety for the treatment of postoperative inflammation following ocular surgery for childhood cataract.
- Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of topical Loteprednol Etabonate (LE), 0.5%, to Prednisolone Acetate 1%, for the treatment of postoperative inflammation following ocular surgery for childhood cataract.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 107
- Subject is a candidate for routine, uncomplicated surgery for childhood cataract
- Subjects who have a severe/serious ocular condition, or any other unstable medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may preclude study treatment or follow-up.
- Subjects with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or those receiving intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering therapy in either eye or systemically.
- Subjects with a history of steroid-induced IOP elevation in either eye.
- Subjects who have known hypersensitivity or other contraindication to the study drug(s) or any components in the drug formulation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Prednisolones acetate Prednisolones acetate Prednisolone acetate 1.0% Loteprednol etabonate Loteprednol etabonate Loteprednol etabonate 0.5%
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anterior Chamber Inflammation Postoperative Day 29 Anterior Chamber Inflammation (for subjects that could only be examined with a pen light and a 20D \[g20 Diopter\] magnifying lens): 0 = None Clear anterior chamber with no visible clouding (Tyndall effect and cells combined). Red reflex normal
1. = Mild Mild anterior chamber clouding. Clear iris pattern on visualization. Red reflex normal
2. = Moderate Moderate anterior chamber clouding
3. = Severe Severe anterior chamber clouding. Iris pattern not clearly visualized. Red reflex diminished
4. = Very severe Severe anterior chamber clouding with a white and/or milky appearance of the anterior chamber. Red reflex absent or severely diminished
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anterior Chamber Cells & Flare Over all visits 42 days Anterior Chamber Flare (for those subjects that could be examined with a slit lamp):
Assessed scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). 0 = None No Tyndall effect
1. = Mild Tyndall effect barely discernible
2. = Moderate Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is moderately intense. Iris pattern is seen clearly
3. = Severe Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is severely intense. Iris pattern cannot be seen clearly
4. = Very severe Tyndall effect is very severely intense. The aqueous has a white and milky appearance
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bausch & Lomb Inc
🇺🇸Rochester, New York, United States