Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
- Conditions
- Restorative Dental Treatment by Buccal Infiltration Anaesthesia
- Interventions
- Other: 4% articaine infiltration
- Registration Number
- NCT06353815
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
Clinical evaluation of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus inferior alveolar nerve block during restorative dental treatment in mandibular first permanent molars
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
-
Clinical Criteria:
- Children aged between 6 years and 9 years having:
- Mandibular first permanent molar with simple caries not involving pulp showing the following criteria: A. No history of spontaneous pain, pathologic mobility, draining sinus tract, redness or swelling of the vestibule. B. Normal gingival and periodontal condition, with no sensitivity to vestibular palpation, and no pain on percussion test.
Radiographic criteria:
- No sign of radiolucency in periapical or furcation area.
- No widening of PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity.
- No evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption
-
• Uncooperative children.
- Children with systemic disease.
- Lack of informed consent by the child patient's parent.
- Refusal of participation.
- Allergy from anesthetic agent.
- Acute infection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group II (Control group) 4% articaine inferior alveolar nerve block 4% articaine infiltration - Group I (Experimental group) 4% articaine infiltration 4% articaine infiltration -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Success of local anesthesia 10 minutes Operator will record the LA as Successful if the scheduled restorative treatment was completed with standard treatment management strategies after administration of the trial anaesthetic. If treatment could not be continued after 10 minutes from when the LA was first administered, and the full 1.8 ml cartridge of the trial anaesthetic had been used, then the LA was considered unsuccessful
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Child behavior during treatment Intraoperative Doaa Moustafa: he patient's behavior will be evaluated for pain perception during treatment using the SEM scale (Appendix 3: SEM scale ). The SEM scale is an objective pain \[10:04 pm, 31/3/2024\] Doaa Moustafa: assessment scale with scores ranging from 1 to 4, illustrating comfort to severe discomfort based on sounds, eye, motor parameters