跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01106001
NCT01106001已完成4 期

A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial on the Efficacy of Periarticular Levo Bupivicaine Injection Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty

Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation, Ireland2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 91 人开始时间: 2008年9月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
91
试验地点
2
主要终点
To determine a significant difference (p>0.05) in morphine consumption between the two treatment groups post-operatively.

研究概览

简要总结

The hypothesis of this study is that isolated use of local periarticular levobupivicaine injection during primary hip arthroplasty would improve post-operative pain control. Patients were randomised in the operating room to receive either a periarticular infiltration, or a placebo consisting of Saline. Morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient, while the modified McGill pain scale was used to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration. 91 patients were recruited, with 45 patients in the treatment group and 46 controls. The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.

详细描述

The efficacy of periarticular injections during total knee arthroplasty is well established but there is little published data on their effect in primary hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that isolated use of local periarticular levobupivicaine injection during primary hip arthroplasty would improve post-operative pain control. A double blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial on patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty was performed. Patients were randomised in theatre to receive either a periarticular infiltration of 150mg levobupivicaine in 60mls of 0.9% Saline, or a placebo consisting of 60mls 0.9% Saline. Morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient, while the modified McGill pain scale was used to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration. 91 patients were recruited, with 45 patients in the treatment group and 46 controls. The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Consecutive patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis only were included in this study after giving informed consent.

排除标准

  • Patients with cognitive impairment, neurological disorders, advanced liver or renal impairment, known ischemic heart disease, a previous diagnosis of a pain syndrome or any post-operative surgical or medical complications were excluded.

研究组 & 干预措施

Levobupivacaine

Active Comparator

Levobupivacaine is indicated for local anaesthesia including infiltration, nerve block, ophthalmic, epidural and intrathecal anaesthesia in adults; and infiltration analgesia in children

干预措施: Levobupivacaine (Drug)

Saline

Placebo Comparator

Saline (also saline solution) is a general term referring to a sterile solution of sodium chloride (NaCl, more commonly known as salt) in water but is only sterile when it is placed intravenously, otherwise, a saline solution is a salt water solution.

干预措施: Saline (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

To determine a significant difference (p>0.05) in morphine consumption between the two treatment groups post-operatively.

时间窗: 1 year

The modified McGill pain scale was administered to determine the adequacy of analgesia and the benefit of the peri-articular infiltration. In addition, morphine and analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient. The results were assessed after one year, once all the information from both treatment groups was collected.

次要结局

  • To analyse the length of stay for between both treatment groups(Average 6 days (based on precise day of discharge))

研究者

发起方
Orthopaedic Research and Innovation Foundation, Ireland
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验