DRKS00003122已完成不适用
Case-control study single port cholecystectomy versus conventional cholecystectomy
Asklepios Klinik LangenAkademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Goehte-Universität Frankfurt0 个研究点目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2011年9月12日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 200
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •chronic and acute cholecystolithiasis
排除标准
- •previous laparotomies, liver cirrhosis
研究者
相似试验
Unknown
不适用
Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Impact on Postoperative PainPostoperative PainNCT01348620IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria di Negrar58
已完成
不适用
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic CholecystectomyCholelithiasisBiliary DyskinesiaNCT00981604Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City60
已完成
不适用
Scrutinizing (in)efficient use of cholecystectomy: a randomized trial concerning variation in practice.Cholelithiasisgallstone disease1001762810019818NL-OMON45086Academisch Medisch Centrum1,038
已完成
不适用
Randomized Control Trial of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine During CholecystectomyGall Stone PancreatitisCholecystitisNCT01528722University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust42
已完成
不适用
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. needlescopic cholecystectomy; which is better for both surgeons and patients?JPRN-UMIN000022357Morioka Municipal Hospital Department of Surgery100