Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06136234
NCT06136234
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

COVE (Caring for Vets and Service Members)

University of Washington1 site in 1 country521 target enrollmentStarted: April 30, 2024Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
521
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Suicidal Ideation

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to study stressed or distressed veterans and service members. Researchers will compare Caring Contacts plus best available resources to best available resources alone to see if reduces distress and prevents thoughts of suicide.

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether Caring Contacts via text message are beneficial to veterans and service members experiencing stress or distress. In the past, Caring Contacts interventions have focused on individuals who are already suicidal and not a more general population. In addition, a core objective of this study is to understand the mechanisms of action of Caring Contacts and thus has included an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) component that will allow us to determine when and how Caring Contacts is making an impact.

Study aims are to

Evaluate if stressed or distressed veterans receiving Caring Contacts are at greater or less risk of suicidal ideation or behavior as evidenced by:

Decreased mean and reduction in variability of indicators of suicide risk (motivation to live, passive ideation, active ideation, suicide intent, and urges to harm self) acquired during Ecological Momentary Assessment periods.

Reduced risk of suicidal ideation (HASS-I) and cognitions (SCS-R) during follow-up.

Examine diverse veterans' experiences with Caring Contacts (i.e., access, satisfaction, preferences, potential mechanisms)

Evaluate if veterans receiving Caring Contacts will show a decrease in distress (i.e., isolation, depression, substance use, loneliness, defeat, hopelessness, and psychological pain)

Identify potential mechanisms of action for Caring Contacts by exploring the relationship between potential mechanisms (i.e., mattering, connectedness, social responsibility, and entrapment), distress, and suicide risk observed during ecological momentary assessment periods to identify potential mechanisms of action of Caring Contacts on decreasing distress and suicide risk

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

All outcome measures are completed by the participant via online survey.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • US service member or veteran
  • 18 years or older
  • Lives in the United States
  • Stressed (recent separation from or in transition out of the military, unemployment, financial strain, unhoused, or suicide loss, etc.) or distressed (isolation, depression, substance use, loneliness, defeat, hopelessness, psychological pain, or suicidal ideation, etc.)
  • Willingness to be contacted periodically by text message and either email or postal mail

Exclusion Criteria

  • \- Unable to consent due to inability to understand the consent form due to cognitive limitations or insufficient English (as determined by inability to pass the consent quiz items)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Suicidal Ideation

Time Frame: Baseline and 12 month follow-up

Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale (HASS-I), adapted version for study procedures. Min=0, max=60, higher scores indicate higher suicidal ideation.

Suicide risk Visual Analog Scales (VAS)

Time Frame: 3 EMA assessments/day for 14 days at baseline; then either 3 EMA assessments/day for 7 days at 12 months OR 3 EMA assessments/day for 7 days/month for 12 months (depending on EMA condition)

Suicide risk indicators rated on Visual Analog Scales (VAS; 0-10) acquired during Ecological Momentary Assessment periods. Core constructs of suicide risk selected and worded to maximize face validity: motivation to live, passive ideation, active ideation, and urges for suicide. Higher scores indicate higher suicidal risk (motivation to live is reverse coded).

Suicide Cognitions

Time Frame: Baseline and 12 month follow-up

Suicide Cognitions Scale - Revised, Min=16, max=80, higher scores indicate more suicidal cognitions.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Loneliness(Baseline and 12 month follow-up)
  • Substance Abuse(Baseline and 12 month follow-up)
  • Psychological Pain(Baseline and 12 month follow-up)
  • Defeat(Baseline and 12 month follow-up)
  • Hopelessness(Baseline and 12 month follow-up)
  • Experience of receiving Caring Contacts(12 month follow-up)
  • Depression(Baseline and 12 month-up)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Kate Comtois

Professor: School of Medicine

University of Washington

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials