Tiotropium vs. Inhaled Corticosteroids in Children With Nonatopic Asthma Pilot Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 11
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in c-ACT score between standard therapy (inhaled corticosteroids) and tiotropium
研究概览
简要总结
Most children with asthma have concurrent atopy (allergic inflammation), which is associated with an improved response to ICS. However, the absence of an atopic phenotype is associated with a poorer ICS response, leaving clinicians with limited treatment options. The nonatopic asthma phenotype has been characterized as the absence of atopic diseases including allergic rhinitis, eczema, or food allergies, and a negative skin prick test to common aeroallergens. Children with mild asthma treated with ICS over 44 weeks without a positive allergen skin test are 3 times more likely to have an asthma exacerbation when compared with children with positive skin tests. Similarly, adolescents and adults with asthma with low blood eosinophils or low sputum eosinophils have no difference in exacerbation rate response to ICS compared with placebo. Due to poor ICS response in nonatopic children and the known adverse effects of ICS, the development of non-steroid treatments options is needed.
Monotherapy with the long-acting muscarinic antagonist, tiotropium, was superior to placebo for treatment failure outcomes in adolescents and adults with low sputum eosinophil levels. Tiotropium is approved in children as an add on therapy to ICS in children ≥ 6 years with asthma. But, this combination of treatment would still expose children with nonatopic asthma to the risks (but potentially without the benefit) of ICS therapy. The objective of this study is to conduct a feasibility pilot safety study of 6-weeks treatment with tiotropium monotherapy vs. ICS in children ages 6 to 11 years old with nonatopic mild persistent asthma.
详细描述
Asthma Phenotype Variations Suggest the Need for Improved Tailoring of Treatment Options Asthma is the most common chronic disease among children worldwide. Asthma is characterized by chronic airway inflammation; symptoms vary by intensity and frequency over time. The asthma phenotype (observable characteristics such as symptoms and pulmonary function) may present similarly in children, but differences in the underlying endotypes (pathophysiological and/or molecular mechanisms, e.g.T-helper type 2 cell (Th2)-low and Th2-high asthma) indicate that varying processes are present that can affect treatment response Established guidelines (Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [NHLBI]) recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first line therapy in all children with persistent asthma to manage the inflammatory process and thus, control symptoms (wheeze, shortness of breath, cough, nocturnal awakenings). Yet, currently, 22%-60% of children with asthma continue to present with symptoms or remain poorly controlled while treated according to the established guidelines, which include ICS. Thus, additional studies are needed in children with phenotypes that are poorly responsive to guideline-based therapy with ICS to identify optimal management.
Because asthma phenotypes present similarly (though differing by severity), ICS continue to be the first line of treatment for patients with persistent asthma despite potential differences in underlying pathophysiology (Th2-low and Th2-high endotype). In a controlled trial in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma, 55% were unresponsive to monotherapy treatment with either ICS or montelukast despite over 90% adherence by dose counting. Response to ICS treatment has been associated with several markers of an allergic phenotype that include higher serum eosinophil cationic protein (or serum eosinophil levels), elevated serum IgE, skin test positivity, and elevated exhaled nitric oxide. Indeed, children with mild asthma treated with ICS over 44 weeks who have a positive allergen skin test are 70% less likely to have an asthma exacerbation when compared with children without positivity.
Poor asthma control associated with inadequate treatment response is associated with more health care provider visits, direct costs, and work absenteeism than those with well-controlled asthma. Biomarker-driven asthma management has been suggested as an emerging strategy to improve asthma control by matching treatment selection to underlying endotype (Th2 low vs. Th2 high asthma) differences in pathophysiology. An understudied population of children with asthma are those who lack an allergic phenotype. Treatment response to ICS is poor in this population, but studies have been limited to subgroup analysis from larger populations of mixed phenotypes. Therefore, those children who lack an allergic phenotype may not be optimally treated with guideline-recommended ICS therapy and require studies focused on this phenotype.
Variability in the Definition of the Nonatopic Asthma Phenotype The nonatopic asthma phenotype has been incompletely described and published studies often report varying characteristics. Typical characteristics include the absence of atopic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, eczema, or food allergies; having normal serum IgE levels; and having normal serum eosinophil levels. The most common factor identifying the child with nonatopic asthma is a negative skin prick test (SPT) to common aeroallergens in combination with physician-diagnosed asthma.
Inhaled Corticosteroid Response in Children with Nonatopic Asthma is Suboptimal, and Treatment Options are not Well Studied.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 Years 至 11 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Children ages 6 to 11 years with controlled mild nonatopic persistent physician diagnosed asthma
- •Non-atopic asthma: absence of a positive SPT to inhaled aeroallergens or negative specific IgE to a common regional allergen panel; historical serum IgE less than 200 IU/ml; historical serum eosinophils less than 350 cells per microliter (cells/mcL); no history of eczema; no history of allergic rhinitis; no history of food allergy
- •Physician-diagnosed asthma: positive family history, recurrent asthma symptoms, bronchodilator responsiveness, and evidence of obstruction.
- •Mild persistent asthma: current treatment with as-needed albuterol or low-dose ICS or daily montelukast (Step 2 therapy)
- •Controlled asthma: Childhood Asthma Control Test score >19
- •Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥ 80% of predicted
排除标准
- •Oral corticosteroid use in the past 6 weeks
- •Use of ICS in combination with long-acting beta agonist or montelukast
- •History of life-threatening asthma requiring treatment with intubation or mechanical ventilation within the past 5 years
- •Respiratory tract infection within the past 4 weeks
- •Any other chronic diseases or medical conditions (other than asthma) that in the opinion of the investigator would prevent participation in a trial
研究组 & 干预措施
Tiotropium arm
Subjects on this arm will start the study on tiotropium for 6 weeks. Received prescribed asthma controller medication for 2 weeks " washout" and complete 6 week on the prescribed asthma controller medication.
干预措施: Tiotropium Bromide (Drug)
ICS arm
Subjects on this arm will start the study on the prescribed asthma medication for 6 weeks. Received prescribed asthma controller medication for 2 weeks " washout" and complete 6 week on Tiotropium.
干预措施: Tiotropium Bromide (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in c-ACT score between standard therapy (inhaled corticosteroids) and tiotropium
时间窗: The c-ACT will be collected during visit #1 in day 1; visit #2 after 6 weeks at the end of the first arm; visit #3 after 8 weeks at the end of the "wash-out period"; and visit #4 after 14 weeks at the last visit.
The primary outcome is change in asthma control from baseline to the end of 6-weeks treatment with tiotropium versus ICS. Asthma control will be assessed by the Childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT) score. The c-ACT is well validated for assessing asthma control in children aged 4-11 years.41 The c-ACT ranges from 0 to 27; a score of 19 indicates inadequately controlled asthma.
次要结局
- Spirometry FEV1(The Spirometry FEV1 will be collected during visit #1 in day 1; visit #2 after 6 weeks at the end of the first arm; visit #3 after 8 weeks at the end of the "wash-out period"; and visit #4 after 14)
- Complete Blood Count with Differential (CBC)(The Complete Blood Count with Differential (CBC) will be collecte on day #1 duringf the first visit.)
- Daily Digital Diary(The subjects will answer the Daily Digital Diary every day from day 1 until the completion of the study at 14 weeks.)
- Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)(The Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) will be collecte on day #1 duringf the first visit.)
研究者
Gerardo Vazquez Garcia
Faculty Physician
Nemours Children's Clinic
