rTMS Efficacy Coupled With Mirror Therapy
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Interventions
- Other: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)Other: Mirror therapy using sham mirrorOther: Mirror therapy using virtual reality
- Registration Number
- NCT04867187
- Brief Summary
Neuropathic pain is particularly difficult to treat with classic first-line drugs. Neuromodulation techniques using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are useful alternative, but there is a need to improve their analgesic effect.Virtual reality mirror therapy has shown the capacity to alleviate pain and may be easily coupled with rTMS.The present project will investigate in individuals with neuropathic pain the effects of the rTMS coupled with virtual reality mirror therapy.
- Detailed Description
This project introduces a new research question that incorporates virtual reality mirror therapy into an established treatment protocol of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for neuropathic pain relief. Neuropathic pain is particularly difficult to treat with classic first-line drugs. Neuromodulation techniques using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are useful alternative, but there is a need to improve their analgesic effect.
Virtual reality mirror therapy has shown the capacity to alleviate pain and may be easily coupled with rTMS. The efficacy of using both techniques in neuropathic pain treatment is unknown. The present project will investigate in individuals with neuropathic pain the effects of the rTMS coupled with virtual reality mirror therapy on: 1) daily pain intensity (i.e. analgesic efficacy); 2) other components of pain and the quality of life; 3) brain activity.
It will be the first to provide insight into the efficacy of using together both non-invasive technics of cortical neuromodulation to alleviate pain.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
- Clinical symptoms typical of neuropathic pain
- Refractory to drug therapies
- Lasting for at least 6 months, with a moderate to severe pain intensity (≥4/10 on Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and a stable pain treatment since 1month at least
- Having right to health benefits
- Ferromagnetic components and implanted microprocessors (i.e. cochlear implants)
- Drug-resistant or active epilepsy, pacemaker, pregnancy, ongoing depression or personality troubles, and ongoing opioid treatment.
- Any other contraindications to MRI scanner (e.g., claustrophobia, etc.).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description rTMS active and active mirror-based therapy using virtual reality Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) The patient will have an amount of 4 sessions (S3, S5, S7 and S9) for 1.5 months: 1 session every 2 weeks. The patient will receive rTMS active and active mirror-based therapy using virtual reality. rTMS active and sham mirror-based therapy using virtual reality Mirror therapy using sham mirror The patient will have an amount of 4 sessions (S3, S5, S7 and S9) for 1.5 months: 1 session every 2 weeks. The patient will receive rTMS active and sham mirror-based therapy using virtual reality. rTMS active and sham mirror-based therapy using virtual reality Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) The patient will have an amount of 4 sessions (S3, S5, S7 and S9) for 1.5 months: 1 session every 2 weeks. The patient will receive rTMS active and sham mirror-based therapy using virtual reality. rTMS active and active mirror-based therapy using virtual reality Mirror therapy using virtual reality The patient will have an amount of 4 sessions (S3, S5, S7 and S9) for 1.5 months: 1 session every 2 weeks. The patient will receive rTMS active and active mirror-based therapy using virtual reality.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain intensity measurement Week 9 Averages of the daily visual analogue scale scores (min no pain max pain imaginable) measured during the first week (Week 1) and that measured during the week following the last session (week 9)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spontaneous brain activity week 12 Functional MRI at rest
Adverse events Week 3, 5, 7, 9,12 Nature and number of adverse events
Quality of life after treatment week 12 EQ5D scale (min = 0 worst imaginable health condition and max = 100 best health condition imaginable) and Analgesic consumption of Appeal
neuropathic dimension Week 3, 5, 7, 9,12 overall score of the neuropathic pain symptoms inventory (NPSI) (min = 0 no neuropathic pain and max = 100 intensive neuropathic pain)
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer
🇫🇷Bron, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne
🇫🇷Saint-Étienne, France