NCT02994862UnknownNot Applicable
One Year Clinical Evaluation of E. Max Laminate Veneers With and Without Using Galla Chinnesis as Natural Cross Linking and Remineralizing Agent Before Bonding to Teeth With Amelogenesis Imperfecta
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 16
- Primary Endpoint
- marginal adaptation assessed by clinical evaluation using dental mirror and probe
Study Overview
Brief Summary
In teeth requiring laminate veneers with amelogenesis imperfecta Will application of galla chinensis before Bonding of laminate veneers with adhesive resin cement provide better survival rate than conventional Bonding method
Detailed Description
one year Clinical evaluation of laminate veneers with amelogenesis imperfecta Will application of galla chinensis before Bonding of laminate veneers with adhesive resin cement provide better survival rate than conventional Bonding method
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •All subjects are required to be:
- •From 18-60 years old, and able to read and sign the informed consent document.
- •Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures
- •Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
- •Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer (e.g. discoloration, fracture not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition, ....)
- •Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
- •Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss
- •Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation
- •Pregnant women
- •Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
- •Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
marginal adaptation assessed by clinical evaluation using dental mirror and probe
Time Frame: 1 year
clinical evaluation of marginal adaptation
Secondary Outcomes
- Patient satisfaction assessed using a Questionnaire(1 Year)
Investigators
Mohammed Gamal Fahmy Mohammed
B.D.S
Cairo University
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
One Year Clinical Evaluation of E.Max Laminate Veneers With and Without Using Grape Seed Extract as a Natural Collagen Cross-linking Agent Before BondingRetention & Fracture of Emax Laminate VeneersNCT02939417Marwa Salem16
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison in Marginal Adaptation Between Conventional and Gull Wing Preparation in Laminates VeneersTeeth SensitivityNCT03214549Cairo University38
Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Performance of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Made With Celtra Duo Press and IPS e.Max Press CeramicTooth DiscolorationFractureNCT03713970Cairo University6
Unknown
Not Applicable
Clinical Longevity of Ceramic Laminate VeneersDental Restoration Failure of Marginal IntegrityNCT03645551University Medical Center Groningen110
Unknown
Not Applicable
One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max CAD and Lava Ultimate Laminate VeneersDiscoloration, ToothNCT03086928Cairo University16