Feasibility of Delivering an Avatar Life-review Intervention to Support Patients With Active Cancer

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Cancer
• Interventions: Behavioral: Avatar Life Review

• Registration Number: NCT03996642
• Lead Sponsor: Virginia Commonwealth University

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of an integrated art and technology, storytelling, life review platform for patients with active cancer. The VoicingHan project is an avatar storytelling platform designed for patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care at Virginia Commonwealth University's Massey Cancer Center. VoicingHan supports terminally ill patients by using oral storytelling as an artistic medium to facilitate patients' interactive performances. Movement-based, creative expression has been shown to reduce stress and depression. By projecting movement-based actions onto an avatar, this can serve as a tool to express emotional distress, address satisfaction with care, and view cancer in a different light.

Detailed Description

Life reviews have been used in palliative care to help individuals integrate memories into a meaningful whole, providing a balanced view of the past, present and future. Life review is also an evaluative process, enabling participants to examine how memories contribute to the meaning of their life.

VoicingHan, the software program that will be used in this study, provides an illusion that the Avatar is speaking, allowing users to observe their stories in real time, potentially encouraging deeper reflection and memory retrieval. The technology uses motion capture (MoCap) to translate human movement into a digital platform. MoCap offers several advantages: lightweight, sensitive to minute movement, and user-friendly.

Patients will select avatars from different age groups during their sessions, allowing them to retrieve specific, positive memories of different lifetime periods and facilitating a more candid autobiographical memory. Creative expression may serve as a vehicle for patients with a life limiting illness in finding purpose and creating a sense of meaning. The integration of art and technology into a storytelling, life-review platform through means of engaging the physical, psychological, and spiritual domains will support patients to contemplate their own mortality.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-06-11
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-06-20
• Study First Posted: 2019-06-25
• Study Start: 2019-07-19
• Primary Completion: 2019-08-30
• Study Completion: 2019-10-23
• Status Verified: 2020-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-02-04
• Last Update Posted: 2020-02-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 11

Inclusion Criteria

• Participants must be 18 years of age or older
• Patient participants must have metastatic or locally recurrent cancer
• Participants must be able to understand English
• Participants must be ambulatory
• Ability and willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

• Participants who cannot understand written or spoken English
• Any prisoner and/or other vulnerable persons as defined by NIH (45 CFR 46, Subpart B, C and D).

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Patients with Active Cancer	Avatar Life Review	Eligible participants will undergo an unknown number of Avatar-life review sessions depending on acceptability of the intervention to subjects and the capacity of the team to provide the intervention.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Portion of successfully completed sessions	2 months	The total number of sessions completed in compliance with the required protocol divided by the total number of sessions attempted
The ability to recruit patients to participate in the Avatar Therapy intervention	2 months	Feasibility of recruitment efforts will be determined by the proportion of patients that are enrolled divided by the number of patients contacted and approached to participate.
Patient's perceived benefits of intervention	15 minutes	The research coordinator will conduct an open-ended interview to assess patients' perception of intervention components and identify possible factors influencing feasibility. Questions will address feasibility of setup time, study procedure, and level of comfort

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Determine the number of intervention sessions needed per patient	5 minutes	Participants will complete a 3 item brief survey administered by the research coordinator at the end of each session to determine if patients would benefit from another avatar session. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale from "1= Not at all to "5= A lot/Extremely" with higher scores indicating greater patient satisfaction.
Determine length of time required to set-up the technology	10 minutes	length of setup time as determined when first entering the outpatient room to the arrival of the patient
Determine the average time per session for each participant	60 minutes	Length of session as determined by the start of participant's arrival to their departure.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University; 🇺🇸 Richmond, Virginia, United States