Comparison of the Central Venous Catheter Insertion Techniques: the Thin-wall Needle Versus the Catheter-over-the-needle Technique in Children
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 138
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Guide-wire insertion time
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in central venous catheter insertion time, success rate, and complication between thin-wall needle technique and catheter-over-the-needle technique for central venous catheterization in children.
详细描述
Catheterization was performed using ultrasound with an "out-of-plane" approach by inserting the introducer needle (thin-wall needle technique) or Angiocath Plus™ catheter (catheter-over-the-needle technique) in 45 - 60° to the patient's skin while viewing the vein in a cross section.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- — 至 5 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •surgery under general anesthesia
- •require central venous catheterization
排除标准
- •hematoma in central vein
- •central vein anomaly
- •catheterization site infection
结局指标
主要结局
Guide-wire insertion time
时间窗: interval between skin penetration and removal of the needle or catheter after guide wire insertion, an expected average of 80 seconds
次要结局
- Time to first puncture of central vein(interval between skin penetration of the needle or catheter and flashback of blood, an expected average of 25 seconds)
- Total time of central venous catheter insertion(interval between skin penetration of the needle or catheter and installation of the indwelling catheter, an expected average of 3 minutes)
- Number of central vein puncture trial(up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 25 seconds)
- Number of guide-wire insertion trial(up to 5 times, an expected average observation time of 80 seconds)
研究者
Jin-Tae Kim
Assistant professor
Seoul National University Hospital