Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01344343
NCT01344343
Completed
Not Applicable

HIP Fracture Accelerated Surgical TreaTment And Care tracK (HIP ATTACK) Trial - Feasibility Pilot

Population Health Research Institute3 sites in 2 countries60 target enrollmentJuly 2011
ConditionsHip Fractures

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Hip Fractures
Sponsor
Population Health Research Institute
Enrollment
60
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Feasibility
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

There is preliminary evidence that suggests early surgical treatment of a hip fracture may improve patients' outcomes. The investigators propose to do a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of a large RCT comparing accelerated surgical repair (i.e. surgery within 6 hours of a hip fracture diagnosis) versus standard care (typically surgery after 36-48 hours).

Detailed Description

Hip fractures have devastating consequences: the 30-day mortality rate for men is 9% and for women is 5%, and the risk of disability is substantial. Even among patients who are community-dwelling prior to their hip fracture, 11% are bed-ridden and 16% are in a long-term care facility after one year. The trauma associated with a hip fracture results in pain, bleeding, and immobility. These factors initiate inflammatory, hypercoaguable, stress, and catabolic states that can cause medical complications, including death. Proposed mechanisms for increased mortality and morbidity associated with delayed surgery include 1) complications related to a protracted immobilization (e.g. venous thromboembolism, atelectasis and pneumonia, urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers, and muscle mass loss) and 2) increased cardiovascular events. Delay in surgery may result in protracted immobility and the associated complications, as well as prolonged exposure to the hypercoagulable-inflammatory-sympathetic state which may increase cardiovascular events. Observational data suggests that these mechanisms are indeed important: delayed surgical repair is associated with increased mortality and morbidity after a hip fracture. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies addressed the impact of timing of surgery on the outcome after hip fracture. Five studies reported adjusted measures for mortality. The pooled estimate, based on 721 deaths in 4,208 patients, suggested that early surgical treatment (i.e. within the cut-off of the individual studies) of hip fractures was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (adjusted risk ratio \[RR\] 0.81, 95% confidence interval \[CI\] 0.68-0.96). It is possible that these observational data substantially underestimates the real potential of early surgery. The reason is that the "early surgery" in these studies occurred within 24, 48 or 72 hours. If surgery could be uniformly undertaken within 6 hours, given the potential benefits of earlier mobilization and minimization of the period of the inflammatory hypercoagulable state, the benefits might be substantially greater. The substantial impact of treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke within hours adds credence to this possibility. Despite the evidence, and the possibility that a larger effect might result from even earlier surgery, current data supports only weak inferences. The evidence relies on observational data and is therefore susceptible to residual confounding. The strength of inference from current evidence does not lay a sufficient solid base to justify the substantial system modification required to facilitate accelerated surgical access for all hip fracture patients. The main factors that cause surgical delay after a hip fracture are: 1) the patient presents with comorbidities and surgery is deferred for preoperative diagnostics, risk stratification, and medical optimization ("medical clearance") and 2) surgical operating room and staff resources are not available because hip fractures have low priority in urgent surgery lists ("queuing"). Both medical clearance and queuing are modifiable issues - addressing these obstacles has the potential to substantially reduce surgical wait times. Our ultimate goal is to undertake a large multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) of accelerated surgical care (i.e., goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis) versus usual timing of surgery among elderly adults diagnosed with a hip fracture. This protocol is for a pilot RCT that will inform the feasibility of undertaking a large RCT.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2011
End Date
November 2012
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

P.J. Devereaux

MD, PhD

Population Health Research Institute

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • aged ≥ 45 years AND
  • diagnosed during working hours on week days with a hip fracture requiring surgery
  • Exclusion criteria:
  • We will exclude patients based on the following criteria:
  • patients requiring urgent surgery or urgent interventions for another reason (e.g., subdural hematoma, abdominal pathology requiring urgent laparotomy, acute limb ischemia, other fractures or trauma requiring urgent surgery, or necrotising fascitis; PCI; pacemaker-implantation);
  • open hip fracture;
  • patients refusing participation;
  • patients previously enrolled in the study;
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation not induced by warfarin or intravenous heparin.
  • Criteria in which the timeline of the surgery in the accelerated care group (after accelerated medical work-up) are at the discretion of the attending physicians.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility

Time Frame: 18 months

Feasibility defined as: * ability to recruit 60 patients in 18 months * ability to achieve arrival in the operating room within 6 hours of diagnosis in \>=80% of the patients randomized to accelerated surgery * ability to achieve accelerated surgery in a timely manner * ability to achieve medical clearance in a timely manner * resource requirements to achieve recruitment and follow up

Secondary Outcomes

  • All-cause mortality(30 days)
  • Length of hospital stay(30 days)
  • Length of intensive care unit stay(30 days)
  • Length of stay in rehabilitation facility(30 days)
  • New admission to a long-term care facility(30 days)
  • Functional Independence Measure (motor domain)(30 days)
  • Short form health survey (SF-36) (acute form)(30 days)
  • Delirium(7 days after randomization)
  • Pre-operative Myocardial Infarction(30 Days)
  • Nonfatal Stroke(30 Days)
  • Nonfatal Pneumonia(30 Days)
  • Nonfatal Pulmonary Embolism(30 Days)
  • Sepsis(30 Days)
  • New Congestive Heart Failure(30 Days)
  • Nonfatal Cardiac Arrest(30 Days)
  • Nonfatal myocardial injury after non cardiac surgery (MINS)(30 Days)
  • Composite Endpoint(30 Days)
  • Major or Life-threatening Bleeding(30 Days)

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials