Comprehensive Knee Osteoarthritis Index (CKOAI): Scale Development, Validation and Reliability Testing
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 52
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in Comprehensive Knee Osteoarthritis Index
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Background:
Symptoms, balance, mobility, activities of daily life (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) are to be considered in rehabilitation of the individuals with knee osteoarthritis (IKOA). There are several scales to evaluate subjective perceptions and individual components in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Till date, no scale is available to measure the combined balance, mobility, ADL and QoL in PKOA.
Objectives:
The objectives of the study are to develop a combined measure of symptoms, balance, mobility, ADL and QoL in PKOA, as comprehensive knee osteoarthritis index (CKOAI) and to validate the scale for its content, reliability and minimum detectable change (MDC)
Methods:
The study consists of a three stages. First stage is the scale (CKOI) item development and validation. This includes domain and item generating through systematic literature search to extract items related symptoms, balance, mobility, ADL and QoL in IKOA based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and through structured interviews. During scale validation, an expert panel will review the generated domains and items by Delphi Method, which will undergo revision and pilot testing. Based on the responsiveness of pilot testing will be revised finally. Second stage is to test re-test reliability. The third stage is to report the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).
Data analysis:
All the domains and items in CKOAI will undergo reliability and criterion-related validity. Minimum 50 IKOA will be evaluated with the scale on two occasions within two weeks to establish test retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and Intra class correlation coefficient for test retest reliability will be used to determine the degree of consistency of items in the scale. MDC will be calculated using the formulae, SEM = SD x √ (1-reliability) and MDC95 = √2 x (1.9) x (SEM). Significant level will be set at p value less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) to minimize the type-I error.
Detailed Description
Introduction:
One of the worldwide leading causes of disability and pain is osteoarthritis. 22% to 39% of 1.252 billion population suffer from osteoarthritis (OA). Hip and knee OA are the most prevalent forms of OA with the overall prevalence of knee OA is 28.7%. This will increase by 33.5% in 2030 due to alarming increase in aging population. Individuals with knee OA (IKOA) are seen with deficits in static and dynamic balance which comprises of impaired proprioception, muscle strength, disturbed postural control and decreased range of motion at knee joint. Furthermore, IKOA have pain and increase physical limitation and functional limitation. Eventually decreasing their quality of life (QoL).
Static balance in IKOA are assessed using several outcome measures such as, timed single-leg stance, functional reach test and variation of postural sway in unipedal or bipedal stance. More than two decade, Berg Balance Scale and Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (balance subscale) were used to asses dynamic balance. Recently, Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M) have been validated for the purpose. Isokinetic dynamometer has been in use for the purpose of estimating muscle strength. Proprioception was measured by joint repositioning test. Several researchers explored QoL in IKOA,and combined with functional independence.
Various measures of knee function adopted by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) are subjective in nature. Patient reported problem based rating scale in IKOA with objective scoring is still lacking. There, the purpose of this research project is to develop a rating scale which does combine assessment of balance, mobility, ADL and QoL in IKOA.
Statement of the Problem:
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Other
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 40 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Individuals with osteoarthritic changes of grade 1 and greater on knee radiograph (Kellgren and Lawrence)
- •Individuals with unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis
- •Both male and female
- •Individuals who able to understand simple command
- •Individuals who are willing to participate
Exclusion Criteria
- •History of hip and knee replacement surgery
- •History of knee arthroscopic surgery within 6 months
- •Any neurologic and musculoskeletal condition which affect their movement or balance
- •Comorbidities such as cancer or cardiovascular disease
Arms & Interventions
Test-retest reliability testing
Minimum 50 IKOA will be evaluated with the scale on two occasions within two weeks to establish test retest reliability.
Intervention: Test-retest reliability testing (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in Comprehensive Knee Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: two occasions within two weeks to establish test retest reliability
Set of patient reported outcome measures
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Asir John Samuel
Associate Professor and Research Scholar
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be University)