A comparison of banded space maintainer versus bonded space maintainer -a randomized control trial
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K049- Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/01/039141
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Umm Kulthum Moideen
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 30
INCLUSION CRITERIA
1. Clinical criteria
1) 6-9 years old healthy children without any systemic disease
2)Extraction site in relation to 74 or 84 preferably 1 week after the extraction
3) Sound and healthy adjacent teeth where ribbond or band and loop are fixed (abutment
teeth)
4) Absence of crossbite, open bite and deep bite
5) Parents and patients who are willing to participate in the study.
2. Radiographic criteria
1) Absence of periapical pathology in relation to abutment teeth.
2) Presence of succedaneous tooth bud.
3) Presence of more than one mm bone overlying the succedaneous tooth germ and/or less
than one third of root of permanent tooth formed
1) Parents and children who are not willing to participate in the study
2) Carious on buccal and lingual surfaces of abutment teeth.
3) Absence of teeth on mesial and distal side of edentulous area.
4) Patients with systemic diseases or children with any differentially challenged conditions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical success which includes failure criterias of FRCR and band and loop space <br/ ><br>maintainers ,caries status and gingival health <br/ ><br>status .Timepoint: At baseline 3months and 6months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Salivary parameter changes which includes salivary IgA,salivary pH and buffering <br/ ><br>capacity. <br/ ><br>Patient acceptance .Timepoint: At baseline 3 months and 6 months