A Peer-Led, Medical Disease Self-Management Program for Mental Health Consumers
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Emory University
- Enrollment
- 400
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI) face high rates of medical comorbidity as well as challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, there is little existing research examining the effectiveness of peer-led medical self-management programs for this population. in this trial, participants were randomized to either the Health and Recovery Peer program (HARP), a medical disease self-management program led by certified peer specialists, or to care as usual. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Detailed Description
Persons with serious mental illnesses (SMI) face elevated rates of medical comorbidity, and also challenges in effectively managing these health problems. There is an urgent need to develop self-management strategies that allow persons with SMI to more effectively manage their chronic medical illnesses.
In general populations, peer-led disease self-management interventions have been demonstrated to be feasible, effective, scalable, and to lead to sustainable improvements in self-management and health outcomes. With funding from an R34 intervention development grant from NIMH, the study team has developed and piloted a modified version of the most widely tested and used peer-led self management program, the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP), for persons with serious mental illness. Two pilot tests of this intervention, the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, demonstrated that the program can be implemented with high engagement, retention, and program fidelity, and can result in effect sizes across a range of outcomes comparable to or greater than those seen in general medical populations.
This application proposes to conduct a fully-powered, multisite trial of the HARP program. A total of 400 individuals with serious mental illnesses and one or more chronic medical condition will be recruited from three diverse community mental health clinics in the Atlanta metro region and randomized to the HARP program or usual care. For individuals in the HARP program, two peer educators with SMI and one or more chronic medical condition will lead a six-session, six-week manualized intervention, which helps participants become more effective managers of their chronic illnesses. Follow-up interviews and chart reviews at 3 months, 6 months and one year will assess changes in clinical outcomes, improvement in generic and disease-specific measures of illness self-management, and quality of care. During the final phase of the study, a dissemination strategy building on the CDSMP training infrastructure will allow program participants to lead HARP groups.
This study will establish the first fully peer-led, evidence-based intervention for improving physical self-management in this vulnerable population.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •On CMHC roster of active patients.
- •Presence of a serious mental illness (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder
- •Chronic Medical Condition as noted in the CMHC chart or via self-report: (hypertension; arthritis; heart disease; diabetes; and asthma/COPD),
Exclusion Criteria
- •cognitive impairment based on a score of > 3 on a 6-item, validated screener developed for clinical research
Arms & Interventions
HARP Intervention
Intervention: HARP Intervention (Behavioral)
No Intervention: Control
Participants in usual care will continue to obtain any mental health or peer-support services that they would otherwise be receiving.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
The short form-36-item (SF-36) Physical component score (PCS) is a measure of HRQOL constructed for use in the Medical Outcomes Study that rely upon patient self-reporting and reflects the physical functioning. The scores ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater levels of physical functioning.
Secondary Outcomes
- Behavioral Activation(Baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention)
- Medication Adherence(Baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention)
- Dietary Intake(Baseline, 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention)
Investigators
Benjamin Druss
Professor
Emory University