COMPARISON OF DEVICES(SCREEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND MACINTOSH) FOR PASSING TUBE IN AIRWAY AND ITS EFFECTS.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signsHealth Condition 2: null- UNDERGOING ELECTIVE SURGERY
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/01/030476
- Lead Sponsor
- DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA Grade I & II patients.
Age between 20-60 years
Weight between 40-70 kg
Patients with either sex
Patients planned for elective surgery
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with previous history of multiple/ failed intubation.
Patients with predicted difficult laryngoscopy except for all class of MP Grades
Patients with any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device
Mouth opening less than 2.5cm.
Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To compare the haemodynamic changes i.e. difference in Mean arterial blood pressure(MABP) and Heart rate using Screenvideo laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope as an intubating aid.Timepoint: Immediately after intubation,1 minute, 3 minute and 5 minute after intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Success rate of intubation <br/ ><br>2.Time taken for intubation <br/ ><br>3.Maneuvers needed for successful intubation <br/ ><br>4.Ease of intubation <br/ ><br>5.Number of attempts taken for intubation <br/ ><br>6.Complications if any <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2 YEARS