MedPath

Bulk-fill With Different Technique Three-year Clinical Performance

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
Bulk-fill Which is Special Type of Resin Composite
Interventions
Other: Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration
Other: Sonicfill3 restoration
Other: Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration
Other: G-aenial™ BULK Injectable restoration
Registration Number
NCT05861908
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

The current study will be intended to evaluate and compare three-year clinical performance of class II bulk-fill resin composite restorations placed with different techniques.

Detailed Description

Fifty patients with proximal carious lesion in permanent molars were included in the study. A total eighty class II cavities were restored with one of the following bulk-fill resin composite with their adhesive systems (n=20) Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-aenial™ BULK Injectable or Sonicfill3. Double blinded randomized clinical trial with survival and clinical quality were evaluated at baseline, after 12 , 24 and 36months using modified FDI(Fédération dentaire internationale) World Dental Federation criteria

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Good general health
  • Good oral hygienic
  • Patient aging 18-35 year
  • Patient available for follow-up visits compound class II (mesio-occlusal or disto-occlusal)
  • Carious lesion in the external and middle third of dentin thickness
  • ICDAS (International caries detection and assessment system) 4 or 5 that diagnosed clinically and radiographically.
  • Maxillary or mandibular first or second molars
  • Tooth with antagonist and adjacent mesial and distal tooth contact,
  • Normal response to a vitality test.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Severe or chronic periodontitis
  • Heavy bruxism
  • Occlusion fewer than 20 teeth
  • Sensitivity to resin-based material.
  • Patients with orthodontic treatment
  • Patients on pregnancy or lactation
  • chronic use of anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesic, and/or psychotropic drugs
  • Patient potentially unable to attend recall visits
  • Teeth would need direct pulp capping or
  • Teeth act as abutment for fixed or removable prosthesis.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Body Bulk-FillFiltek™ Bulk Fill restoration20 cavity class II restored with Body bulk-fill Resin composite
Sonic-FillSonicfill3 restoration20 cavity class II restored with sonic-fill bulk-fill Resin composite
preheated Bulk-FillHeated Filtek™ Bulk Fill restoration20 cavity class II restored with preheated bulk-fill Resin composite
Injectable Bulk-FillG-aenial™ BULK Injectable restoration20 cavity class II restored with injectable bulk-fill Resin composite
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Esthetic Properties of restorationsThree years Follow up

criteria that evaluated according to Modified FDI(International Dental Federation) world dental federation is:

1. Surface luster

2. Staining

3. Color match and translucency

4. Esthetic and Anatomic form

Descriptive scale from 1 to 5. Note: 1 is clinically excellent 5 is clinically poor

Functional Properties of restorationsThree years Follow up

criteria that evaluated according to Modified FDI (International Dental Federation) world dental federation is:

1. Fractures of material and retention

2. Marginal adaptation

3. Occlusal contour and wear

4. Proximal anatomical form

5. Patient's view

Descriptive scale from 1 to 5. Note: 1 is clinically excellent 5 is clinically poor

Biological Properties of restorationsThree years Follow up

criteria that evaluated according to Modified FDI (International Dental Federation) world dental federation is:

1. Post-operative (hyper-sensitivity) and tooth vitality

2. Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction

3. Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)

4. Periodontal

5. Adjacent Mucosa

6. Oral and General Health

Descriptive scale from 1 to 5. Note: 1 is clinically excellent 5 is clinically poor

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Operative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

🇪🇬

El Mansura, Daqahlia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath