Safety and Efficacy of a Drug Eluting Slim Modiolar Electrode Array
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Interventions
- Device: Cochlear implant
- Registration Number
- NCT06598059
- Lead Sponsor
- Cochlear
- Brief Summary
This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. The goal is to learn if the dexamethasone in the CI632D implant lessens these reactions inside the ear following surgery and if this makes the implant work as well, or even better, in improving hearing than what would be expected with a standard cochlear implant. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve (the nerve that carries sound signals from the ear to the brain). The study participants will receive the CI632D experimental implant and will complete tests to see how well they are hearing and how well the implant is working.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 56
- 18 years or older, at time of consent.
- Postlinguistic moderately severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, defined by a four frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz) pure-tone average unaided threshold (PTA4) ≥ 60 decibels hearing level (dB HL), in the ear to be implanted (For this study, moderately severe is defined by a four-frequency, pure-tone average threshold (PTA4) over the range 500 through 4000 Hz of more than 55 dB HL through 70 dB HL, inclusive. Profound is defined by a PTA4 of more than 90 dB HL).
- Pure-tone average unaided threshold (500 through 4000 Hz) ≥ 30 dB HL, in the contralateral ear.
- Preoperative aided word score ≤ 40% correct in the ear to be implanted.
- Evidence of pneumococcal vaccination (e.g., Pneumovax) according to local guidelines.
- Candidate is proficient in the language used to assess speech perception performance.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
- Intra-axial (within the brain) lesions or deafness due to lesions of the acoustic nerve affecting the ear to be implanted.
- Middle ear infection (including acute otitis media, chronic otitis media, suppurative otitis media, or serous drainage) in the ear to be implanted either at the time of surgery or within 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Active autoimmune disease or active immunosuppressive therapy.
- Presence of a tympanic membrane perforation or a history of otologic surgery within 3 months prior to enrolment, in the ear to be implanted.
- Previously reported diagnosis of auditory neuropathy, in the ear to be implanted.
- Previously reported diagnosis, in the ear to be implanted, of Large Vestibular Aqueduct Syndrome (LVAS), Meniere's disease, or cochlear hydrops.
- Ossification, otosclerosis, malformation or any other cochlear anomaly, such as common cavity, that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array, in the ear to be implanted.
- Current cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts or drains, existing perilymph fistula, skull fracture or CSF leaks.
- Previously reported diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.
- Known allergic reaction or contraindication to dexamethasone or corticosteroids.
- Severe, or poorer, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss prior to 5 years of age, as reported by the subject. (For this study, severe is defined by a PTA4 of more than 70 dB HL through 90 dB HL, inclusive).
- Severe, or poorer, sensorineural hearing loss for more than 20 years, as reported by the subject, in the ear to be implanted.
- Prior cochlear implantation in either ear.
- Medical plan for cochlear implantation during the clinical investigation, contralateral to the ear to be implanted.
- Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate general anaesthesia, surgery, or participation in the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations inherent to the surgical procedure(s) and prosthetic devices, as determined by the Investigator.
- Women who are pregnant.
- Additional disabilities that may affect the subject's participation or safety during the clinical investigation.
- Unable or unwilling to comply with all the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the investigator.
- Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families. Immediate family is defined as spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
- Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organisations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
- Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device unless Cochlear sponsored and determined by Investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D) Cochlear implant Participants will be implanted with the slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array. Drug-eluting electrode array (CI632D) Dexamethasone Participants will be implanted with the slim modiolar dexamethasone-eluting electrode array.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Coprimary endpoint 1: Mean monopolar 1 plus 2 (MP1+2) impedances (kOhms) at 3 months postactivation On day of implantation and at 1- and 3-months postactivation Impedance will be measured across the active electrodes of the implant for each participant.
Coprimary endpoint 2: Mean change in word recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in quiet from preimplantation to 3 months postactivation Preoperative baseline and 3-months postactivation Within-subject change in consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet (% correct) calculated as the average across 2 runs of the test conducted on each participant. CNC word score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean within-subject change in the global score of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12) from preimplantation to postimplantation Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation Within-subject change in Global SSQ12 scores at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. The global SSQ12 score ranges from 0-10, higher the score the better the outcome.
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best unilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Mean within-subject change in sentence recognition score in the best bilateral listening mode in noise from preimplantation to postimplantation Preoperative baseline and 6-months postactivation Within-subject change in AzBio sentence in noise score at a +10 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at 6-months postactivation compared with preoperative baseline. AzBio score ranges from 0-100%, higher the score the better the outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
Oregon Health & Science University
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
🇺🇸Englewood, Colorado, United States
Washington University
🇺🇸St. Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Iowa
🇺🇸Iowa City, Iowa, United States
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
University Hospitals
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States