Comparison of different blood flow monitoring systems in critically ill patients

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Critically ill patients with the need for extended hemodynamic monitoring; Circulatory System

• Registration Number: ISRCTN82629192
• Lead Sponsor: Klinikum der Universität München

Brief Summary

2020 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33247165/ (added 17/01/2023)

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Completion: 2017-03-31
• Study Start: 2019-12-15
• Last Update Posted: 30 January 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients treated on the intensive care unit
2. Critically ill patients
3. Patients with the need of a change of CVC and arterial line in patients with pre-existing and continuing need for TPTD-monitoring
4. Hemodynamic stable patients without vasopressors or with a constant vasopressor-dosage

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant
2. Younger than 18 years old

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Global end-diastolic volume (index) measured using PiCCO and EV1000

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<br> Measured using PiCCO and EV1000<br> 1. Cardiac output/index<br> 2. Cardiac function index<br> 3. Global ejection fraction<br> 4. Extravascular lung water index<br> 5. Pulmonary vascular permeability index<br> 6. Central venous pressure<br> 7. Systolic volume variation<br> 8. Pulse pressure variation<br>