Comparison of pain after Laparoscopic repair of hernia when Self Gripping mesh is used as opposed to mesh fixed with absorbable tackers when performing the surgery.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/10/046213
- Lead Sponsor
- JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POST GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All consenting patients above 18-year age with primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia planned for elective laparoscopic TEP hernioplasty.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Recurrent or giant inguinal hernia with loss of domain.
2.Hernia patients with disorders of hemostasis and coagulation
3.Chronic groin pain due to previously operated opposite side or due to any other medical problems
4.Patients undergoing concomitant surgeries along with mesh repair
5.Morbidly obese patients
6.Intra-operative change from TEP to TAPP or open hernioplasty
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine and compare the postoperative pain by visual analogue (VAS) score in patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP repair using self-gripping mesh and conventional polypropylene mesh fixed with absorbable tackersTimepoint: post operative day -0 at 6 hours and 12 hours <br/ ><br>post operative day 1 <br/ ><br>post operative day 1 <br/ ><br>post operative day 7 <br/ ><br>At 1 month and 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TO COMPARE CHRONIC PAIN AND RECURRENCE <br/ ><br>TO COMPARE QUALITY OF LIFE <br/ ><br>TO COMPARE SHORT TERM SURGICAL OUTCOMESTimepoint: POST OPERATIVE DAY -0,1,7 <br/ ><br>AT 1 MONTH AND 3 MONTHS