Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01718067
NCT01718067
Unknown
Not Applicable

Efficacy of Vakum Technology in Patients With Chronic Hypersecretion.

Villa Pineta Hospital1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentJanuary 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Chronic Bronchitis/Bronchiectasis
Sponsor
Villa Pineta Hospital
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in perceived dyspnea
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Mechanical devices to increase the individual's bronchial hygiene are commonly used to assist patients with chronic retention of secretions. VAKÜM technology has been recently developed with the aim to improve the respiratory condition in hypersecretive patients suffering from chronic respiratory diseases.

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of VAKÜM technology in patients with hypersecretion, and chronic respiratory diseases a clinical trial has been designed.

Patients with chronic respiratory diseases, hypersecretion (sputum production >30 mL/die), and reduced cough efficiency (Peak Cough Expiratory Flow > 150 and < 300 L*min-1) referred to standard pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) will be included. Study design is a single-blind multicentre randomized trial with consecutive recruitment. Following a preliminary run-in period, group comparison will be made between Intervention group using VAKÜM system (Free Aspire, MPR, Legnano-I) added to the conventional manual ELTGOL technique, and Control group using manual ELTGOL alone over 10 daily sessions.

Spirometric lung volumes, respiratory muscle strength, arterial blood gases, and quality of life will be recorded in both groups pre-to-post PR. Perceived dyspnea (by VAS scale), sputum volume and characteristics (on a semi-quantitative 3-point scale) and peak expiratory air flows (PEF and PCEF) will be registered on a daily basis over the study period. Primary outcome is the change in perceived dyspnea; in order to ensure 80% power to detect a 5 point (SD 5) group difference change in the primary outcome at the end of the study period as significant at the 0.05 level, at least 42 patients per group are needed. The minimum target sample size will be then fixed at 50 patients per group.

An higher and faster significant reduction of the perceived dyspnea is supposed in the Intervention group. Additional benefits among the secondary outcomes are also hypothesised in the same group.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2013
End Date
April 2016
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Villa Pineta Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Prof. Clini Enrico

Prof.

Villa Pineta Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients with chronic respiratory diseases
  • hypersecretion condition(sputum production \>30 mL/die)
  • reduced cough efficiency (Peak Cough Expiratory Flow \> 150 and \< 300 L\*min- 1)
  • patients admitted to standard pulmonary rehabilitation

Exclusion Criteria

  • not able to use the device
  • concomitant cardiovascular or neoplastic diseases
  • utilization of Non Invasive Ventilation

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in perceived dyspnea

Time Frame: Baseline and 10 days

Visual Analogic Scale (VAS)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in peak expiratory air flows(Baseline and 10 days)
  • Change in arterial blood gases exchanges(Baseline and 10 days)
  • Change in spirometric lung volumes(Baseline and 10 days)
  • Change in respiratory muscle strength(Baseline and 10 days)
  • Change in sputum volume and characteristics(Daily over 10 days)
  • Change in quality of life(Baseline and 10 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials