Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07078968
NCT07078968CompletedNot Applicable

A Real World Data Collection of Human Amniotic Membrane(s) on Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Venous Leg Ulcers, Pressure Ulcers and Post Operative Wounds.

BioLab Holdings4 sites in 1 country500 target enrollmentStarted: April 23, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
500
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Frequency of wound closure by or on week 16

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ compared to the effectiveness of Standard of Care alone though a retrospective data collection.

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective multi-center study collecting real world evidence on the use of Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ and Standard of Care alone in subjects with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs, and post operative wounds that have not healed with conventional therapy for greater than or equal to 4 weeks.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Control
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Subject had the presence of diabetic foot ulcers, Venous insufficiency ulcers, pressure ulcers and/or post-operative wounds
  • •Subject has retrospectively been treated with Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ or Subject has retrospectively been treated with Standard of Care only.
  • •Subjects should have been treated from January 2022 to present day.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Subjects that did not have a wound closure verification appointment.
  • •Any subject who received any product other than Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ during their treatment time.

Arms & Interventions

Group 2 SOC

De-identified subject data will be extracted from investigators' medical records who were treated with only Standard of Care with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs and post operative wounds. Subjects in the SOC may have received hyperbaric or wound vac therapies as part of their treatments.

Intervention: Standard of Care (Other)

Group 1 Amniotic Membrane

De-Identified subject data will be extracted from investigators' medical records for subjects who received Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ plus SOC in subjects with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs and post operative wounds

Intervention: Tri-Membrane Wrap™ (Device)

Group 1 Amniotic Membrane

De-Identified subject data will be extracted from investigators' medical records for subjects who received Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ plus SOC in subjects with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs and post operative wounds

Intervention: Membrane Wrap™ (Device)

Group 1 Amniotic Membrane

De-Identified subject data will be extracted from investigators' medical records for subjects who received Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ plus SOC in subjects with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs and post operative wounds

Intervention: Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Frequency of wound closure by or on week 16

Time Frame: 16 weeks

Wound closure is defined as: Full epithelialization of the wound with the absence of drainage. Epithelialization is defined as a layer of epithelium visible on the wound surface

Secondary Outcomes

  • Wound improvement by or on End of Study (EOS) from baseline(16 weeks)
  • Incidence of wound recurrence within the 16-week study period(16 weeks)
  • Mean number of wound free days within the 16-week study period(16 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
BioLab Holdings
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials