Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06341751
NCT06341751
Completed
Not Applicable

Psychological Treatment for Persistent Fatigue: a Feasibility Study

Karolinska Institutet1 site in 1 country18 target enrollmentApril 11, 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Fatigue
Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Enrollment
18
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Working alliance
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a non-randomized pilot study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a transdiagnostic psychological intervention for primary care patients in Region Stockholm, Sweden, who suffer from persistent and disabling fatigue.

Detailed Description

Previous research indicates that fatigue is a transdiagnostic symptom dimension rather than a disorder-specific pathofysiology. Similar psychosocial mechanisms can contribute to the development and perpetuation of fatigue across medical conditions. Cognitive and behavioral interventions targeting these perpetuating mechanisms have been found effective in reducing fatigue severity and functional impairment in a range of different fatigue-dominated diagnostic groups. Based on these findings, the investigators have developed a transdiagnostic intervention for primary care patients who suffer from persistent fatigue, independent of primary diagnosis. The treatment is a psychological intervention based on cognitive and behavioral principles that is administered over a period of 4-6 months. Treatment material will be delivered via an online treatment platform and therapist support will be given both face-to-face and via written asynchronous text-messages in the online treatment platform. This initial feasibility study is non-randomized, meaning that all included patients will recieve treatment. The project could provide feasibility of a transdiagnostic treatment for primary care patients with severe and persistent fatigue across medical conditions. If the inclusion procedure, the data-collection procedure, and the treatment are feasible, a larger randomized clinical trial (RCT) studying treatment effect is called for. An adequately powered RCT could provide firm scientific support for a novel, scalable, and cost-effective way to deliver an evidence-based treatment for this large and currently under-treated patient group. This would have a desirable impact on patients, families, healthcare units, and society at large, given that fatigue is associated with substantial suffering and work-disability and that treatment guidelines are currently lacking.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 11, 2024
End Date
January 15, 2025
Last Updated
11 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Elin Lindsäter

clinical psychologist, PhD, Principal Investigator

Karolinska Institutet

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • severe, functionally disabling fatigue as a central symptom for at least 3 months
  • The fatigue is not a direct effect of an active disease process motivating another treatment (e.g., hypo-/hyperthyroidism, anemia, cancer, dementia) or the effect of medication
  • regular access to a computer and to the Internet
  • ability to read and write in Swedish.

Exclusion Criteria

  • substance abuse disorder in the past 6 months
  • Current or past psychosis or bipolar disorder
  • Primary psychiatric disorder of such severity that it merits evidence-based treatment (e.g., obsessive compulsive disorder, moderate to severe depression, post-traumatic stress disorder)
  • elevated risk for suicide
  • anorexia nervosa
  • Initiated or changed psychopharmacological medication (e.g., for depression or anxiety disorders) in the past month
  • ongoing chemotherapy
  • intellectual disability (e.g., severe autism) that affects ability to work with the treatment
  • life circumstances that complicate or make treatment impossible (e.g., domestic violence or ongoing legal disputes)
  • ongoing psychological treatment and/or multimodal rehabilitation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Working alliance

Time Frame: Week 3 and 15 of treatment

Assessed using the Working Alliance Questionnaire (WAI - short version). Scale range is from 6 to 42 with higher scores indicating a better percieved working alliance.

Treatment adherence and completion

Time Frame: Post-treatment (6 months)

Treatment adherence will be assessed by evaluating how many sessions (face-to-face and video-based) the patient received, how many modules of the internet-delivered material the patient accessed, and the amount of time the patient spent in the online treatment platform (data extracted from the platform). Further, number of drop-outs (i.e., patients who discontinued treatment before treatment completion) will be analyzed

Patient satisfaction

Time Frame: Post-treatment (6 months)

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater treatment satisfaction.

Treatment credibility

Time Frame: Three weeks after treatment start

Assessed using the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (C-Scale). The C-Scale is a 5-item measure, scale range is 0 to 50 points with higher scores indicating higher treatment credibility.

Negative effects of treatment

Time Frame: Post-treatment (6 months)

The Negative Effects of Treatment Questionnaire (NEQ-20). The self-report measure consists of three parts. First, respondents endorse specific items in case they have occurred or not during treatment, yes/no (dummy coded as a variable: 1/0). Second, the respondents rate how negatively the negative effect was on four-point Likert-scale, ranging from "Not at all" to "Extremely", 0-4 ("0" being minimum and "4" being maximum). Third, the respondents attribute the negative effect to "The treatment I received" (1) or "Other circumstances" (0) (dummy coded as a variable: 1/0).

Open-ended questions regarding treatment content and presentation

Time Frame: Post-treatment (6 months)

Post-treatment, patients will be asked open-ended questions regarding their perception of the different components of the treatment, how much time they spent working with the treatment, and their thoughts about the usability of the digital platform.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Somatic symptoms(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Perceived Stress(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Feasibility of study inclusion procedures and data-collection(Data will be collected during the recruitment and inclusion phase of the study.)
  • Depressive symptoms(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months). The individual item assessing suicide risk will be administered every 3 weeks during the traetment phase.)
  • Fatigue severity, primary self-rated symptom outcome(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months), and every three weeks during the treatment phase.)
  • Reduced physical activity(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Self-rated health(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Problems concentrating(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Reduced motivation(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Burnout(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Insomnia(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months), and every three weeks during the treatment phase.)
  • Cognitive and behavioral responses to symptoms(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months), and every three weeks during the treatment phase.)
  • General anxiety(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • General self-efficacy(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months), and every three weeks during the treatment phase.)
  • Functional disability(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))
  • Work and Social Adjustment(Assessed pre- and at post treatment (6 months))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials