NCT01223599
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Rhomboid Flap Versus Primary Closure
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Evaluate and Compare Between Excision and Primary Closure Procedure and Rhomboid Flap Technique for the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Enrollment
- 140
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Last Updated
- 15 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To evaluate and compare between excision with primary closure of wound and excision with Rhomboid flap reconstruction in the treatment of pilonidal sinus as regard duration of operation, healing time, hospital stay, complications and recurrence rate.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •chronic pilonidal sinus
Exclusion Criteria
- •pilonidal abcess
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Rhomboid Flap vs. Deep Suturing in Recurrent Pilonidal SinusPilonidal Sinus InfectedNCT06152952Assiut University30
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Flap Coverage in Extraction Sites: A Pilot StudyLoss of Teeth Due to ExtractionNCT03136913Tufts University13
Completed
Not Applicable
Primary Wound Closure Using a Limberg Flap Versus Secondary Wound Healing Following Pilonidal Sinus ExcisionPilonidal SinusNCT01889394Kantonsspital Liestal102
Completed
Not Applicable
Study on Surgical Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus DiseasePilonidal SinusNCT02849197Bezmialem Vakif University802
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Effect of TPRF, LPRF and Open flap debridement in treating upper and lower jaw bony defects in adult patients with gum diseasesHealth Condition 1: K051- Chronic gingivitisCTRI/2021/03/031964DrGowri Pendyala