MedPath

A comparative study between spinal drug ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in planed surgery under spinal anaesthesia

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Measurement and Monitoring,
Registration Number
CTRI/2022/08/044660
Lead Sponsor
GCS Medical College hospital and researah centre
Brief Summary

A Comparative Evaluation of IntrathecalHyperbaricRopivacaineversus HyperbaricBupivacaine in Elective Surgery UnderSpinalAnaesthesia

Aims and Objective :

Tocompare the anaesthetic and analgesic efficacy of  Intrathecal Hyperbaric  Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in patients posted for surgeries underspinal anaesthesia. Primary objective is toevaluate the efficacyand safety of hyperbaricRopivacaine forNeuraxial  blockade compared to hyperbaric Bupivacaine and the secondary objective is tocompare the relative advantages and disadvantages of both the drugs, onset andduration of anaesthesia, perioperative hemodynamic and any adverse effects.

 Material and methods:

•ProspectiveRandomizedControlledStudy

•Total= 200 patients. ASAgrade I and II arerandomlyselected for the study and  dividedinto two groups of 100each.

•Twogroups Group B - receive3.5 ml of0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally.

•GroupR  - receive 3.5 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally.

•Onsetand extent of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, the maximum heightof sensory block, and duration of analgesia, hemodynamic parameters and adverseeffects if any are studied.

**conclusion:**

Ropivacainehas less cardio toxicity and neurotoxicity than Bupivacaine

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria

Patient with informed consent Age between 18 to 75 Years BMI<30kg/m2 ASA I & II Infra umbilical Surgery <3 hours.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient who will not give consent BMI>30kg/m2 ASA III & IV Contraindication to spinal anaesthesia Known Allergy to Ropivacaine or any other local Anaesthetic Agent Duration of Surgery > 3hours Patients on chronic Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet drugs.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To assess between Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine which has less cardiac and neurological complicationimmediate after giving spinal anaesthesia
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To assess the Hemodynamics parameters and the regression of motor and sensory effects between ropivacaine and bupivacaineAfter 4 hours of giving spinal anaesthesia

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

GCS Medical College hospital and research centre

🇮🇳

Ahmadabad, GUJARAT, India

GCS Medical College hospital and research centre
🇮🇳Ahmadabad, GUJARAT, India
Dr Ankita Patel
Principal investigator
9712981484
drankitapatel30@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.