Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Patient Education for Oncological Patients to Promote Self-management in Pain Therapy

Brief Summary

Detailed Description

Nursing staff is trained to conduct the micro-training. The sham intervention is unstructured at the discretion of the respective nurse. They are only informed about the purpose of the sham intervention, the expected time frame and the course of a sample sham intervention. First, the data collection of the group with control intervention is started until the required number of patients is recorded. As soon as these data are complete, the group with study intervention is recorded. The patients are recruited from the oncological outpatient clinics. After the outpatient clinics before a parenteral therapy, they have a waiting period, during which the patient's consent is obtained. The patients are then taken to the intervention room for parenteral therapy. Here, the questionnaire is filled out before, during or after the therapy, and then the intervention with the nurse takes place. This process with a short reflection period must be designed in such a way because the indication for escalation of the opioid pain treatment is made during the oncological consultation which is the only possibility to recruit patients for this pilot study. The way the clinic runs today, the nursing staff is timewise only available for training patients with parenteral therapy. If the patients needed more time to think about it, they would have to be trained separately at a later point in time, which would only be established if the effectiveness of the patient training could be proven. Because the patients are not exposed to any risk from the planned interventions, this procedure is reasonable in our view. In micro-training (study intervention), patients are taught structured knowledge based on the content of a checklist. In addition to pain recording, patients are trained in the use of basic and reserve pain medication and co-analgesics, the most common opioid side effects are discussed and how to react to them. It is also checked that the necessary prescriptions or medication have been given. Furthermore, after completing the BQII Barriers Questionnaire (second part of the questionnaire), patient-related barriers, i.e. concerns or fears of the patient with regard to pain therapy, become apparent. With a factual discussion and a professional weighing of advantages and disadvantages, the nurse tries to break down these barriers and thus promotes the patient's motivation for a well-adapted pain therapy. In the case of sham intervention (control intervention), there is only a conversation between the nurse and the patient. In this conversation the patient is picked up with his current knowledge about his pain therapy and any questions are answered correctly. However, there is no structured transfer of knowledge in the sense of patient training. The data is recorded using a three-part questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire contains questions regarding pain-related restrictions in everyday activities (using the Brief Pain Inventory as the standard for pain assessment of oncological patients as used by the Swiss Cancer League). The second part of the questionnaire deals with patient-related barriers using the BQII Barriers Questionnaire. The third part of the questionnaire consists of global questions: confidence in dealing with pain medication, satisfaction with pain therapy, restriction of the most important activities in everyday life and satisfaction with quality of life. 4 weeks after the intervention, patients are asked to fill in the same three-part questionnaire again. At that time, the questionnaire is sent to them by mail with a reply envelope.

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

• Confidence in handling pain medication, satisfaction with pain therapy and quality of life, restriction of the most important activities in everyday life(20 months)
• Change in patient-related barriers(20 months)