Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03137511
NCT03137511
Completed
Not Applicable

Optimizing Access to Care Through New Technologies: a Randomized Study Evaluating the Impact of Telephone Contact and the Sending by the General Practitioner of Suspicious Lesions Melanoma Photographs Taken With a Smartphone, on the Time Limit to the Consultation With a Dermatologist

Nantes University Hospital1 site in 1 country270 target enrollmentMay 23, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Patients at Risk for Melanoma
Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Enrollment
270
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time limit for consultation general practitioner / dermatologist, patients having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Early detection of melanoma showed an impact on the thickness of the lesions at the time of diagnosis. One challenge is to improve the modalities.

Decrease the rate of non-compliant patients among patients referred to the dermatologist for a suspicious lesion (patients who will never go to the consultation), and reduce the time interval between the first identification of the lesion and the excision allowing the diagnosis are major issues.

Direct contact between the general practitioner (GP) and the dermatologist would probably make it possible to shorten the care pathway of patients with lesions justifying excision.

The objective is to evaluate whether contacting the dermatologist directly by telephone and e-mailing the photograph of a suspicious melanoma lesion can significantly reduce the time required for access to the consultation for the following patients: (a) referred for a suspicious lesion of melanoma by the GP (b) and having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma so that the dermatologist conclude at the need for excision (true positives).

Expected results: The procedure should shorten the care pathway for patients with melanoma and decrease the proportion of patients who do not consult the dermatologist when they were referred ("non-observing patients").

This should facilitate the identification of thinner lesions. The benefit for the patient is then direct with a survival at 5 years higher.

In public health terms, it is expected a benefit as better optimization of resources. In a situation of shortage of professionals, access to the dermatologist should be optimized by optimizing emergency access for patients who require it.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 23, 2017
End Date
November 28, 2018
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Consulting a general practitioner participating in the study,
  • Having a suspicious cutaneous lesion of melanoma according to the MG,
  • Referred to a dermatologist who agreed to participate in the study,
  • \> = 18 years of age, with written informed consent,
  • Affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

  • Consulting a general practitioner who does not participate in the study,
  • Having no suspect melanoma lesion according to MG,
  • Referred to the dermatologist for symptoms or pathologies unrelated to a suspicion of melanoma
  • Wishing to consult a dermatologist who refused to participate in the study,
  • Refusing the transmission by mail of 2 anonymised photos,
  • \<18 years of age, or with no written informed consent.
  • Major under tutelage, under curatorship

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time limit for consultation general practitioner / dermatologist, patients having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma

Time Frame: 12 months

Time limit for consultation between consultation of the general practitioner and consultation with the dermatologist, for patients: 1. referred for a suspicious lesion of melanoma by the general practitioner, 2. and having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma so that the dermatologist conclude at the need for excision

Secondary Outcomes

  • "Non-observing" patients between the 2 randomization groups(12 months)
  • Time limit for consultation general practitioner / dermatologist, patients NOT having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma(12 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials