跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04475783
NCT04475783进行中(未招募)不适用

Head-to-Head Comparison of SIROlimus Versus Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting BallooN Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Artery

Jena University Hospital44 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 478 人开始时间: 2021年4月13日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
478
试验地点
44
主要终点
Safety outcome

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a prospective, interventional, multi-center 1:1 randomized non-inferiority trial.

The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Magic Touch PTA sirolimus drug-coated balloon in comparison to the treatment with PTX drug-coated balloon (control device) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.

详细描述

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries. The long-term success of bare balloon PTA in the fem-oropopliteal segment is hampered by the occurrence of restenosis, which can be reduced by local antiproliferative drug delivery via the PTA balloon catheter.

The rationale of this study is based on the hypothesis that the usage of the Sirolimus-coated Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB is at least equal (non-inferior) with regards to efficacy and safety in comparison with a clinically well-established PTX coated balloon.

The objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study is to compare the Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB with Paclitaxel-coated DCB for treatment of high grade ste-notic or occluded lesions in SFA and / or P1 segment of the popliteal artery (PA) in PAD pa-tients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Subject age ≥ 18
  • Subject has been informed on the nature of the study, the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, agrees to complete the required testing, agrees to participate, and has signed an informed consent form.
  • Rutherford category 2-4 according to the investigator's subjective evaluation
  • Subject has a de novo or re-stenosed lesion with ≥ 70 % stenosis documented angiographically
  • Target lesion length is ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 20 cm by visual estimate of the treating physician
  • Multiple lesions with max. 3 cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 20 cm
  • Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
  • Patency of P2 and P3 segment of the popliteal artery and at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50 % diameter stenosis) in continuity with the femoropopliteal artery
  • Patency of ipsilateral iliac artery (≤ 30% diameter stenosis). Iliac artery stenosis > 30 % may be treated during the index procedure to ensure sufficient inflow.
  • A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment intraluminal
  • Vascular disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the time point of index procedure is allowed, but has to be treated according to randomization or with POBA.
  • A patient can only be enrolled and randomized once with only one target lesion in the SIRONA trial. Please note that only the lesion in one limb can be treated as target lesion for index procedure.

排除标准

  • Failure to successfully cross the target lesion or subintimal target lesion guidewire crossing
  • Flow-limiting dissection after pre-dilatation
  • Angiographic evidence of severe calcification of the target vessel (contiguous calcification on both sides of the vessel)
  • Presence of fresh thrombus in the target lesion
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
  • Prior vascular surgery (including atherectomy, bypass surgery) of the target limb
  • Prior stent in the target lesion
  • Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Any vascular surgical procedure or intervention performed in the target limb within 30 days prior to or planned within 30 days post index procedure
  • Any vascular treatment with PTX or sirolimus-coated devices 60 days prior to index procedure
  • Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as primary stenting, laser, lithotripsy, thrombectomy, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices
  • Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study
  • Life expectancy of less than one year in the investigator's opinion
  • Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, sirolimus, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
  • Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
  • Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • History of major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion

结局指标

主要结局

Safety outcome

时间窗: through 12 months post-procedure

Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel vessel revasculariza-tion

Patency rate (Absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization)

时间窗: one year after study procedure (PTA with medical product under investigation or comparator)

patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or \> 0.15 when compared to post-procedure or restenosis with PVR \> 2.4 evaluated by duplex ultrasound

次要结局

  • TLR rate(1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure)
  • Rutherford classification(at 12 months after study procedure)
  • Walking capacity assessment 2(at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure)
  • Secondary Safety: freedom from all cause death, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization(trough 60 months after study procedure)
  • Walking capacity assessment 3(at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure)
  • Qualilty of Life Assessment(at 1 month, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months)
  • Walking capacity assessment 4(at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure)
  • Duplex Ultrasound(post-procedure and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months or at any time of re-intervention)
  • Walking capacity assessment 1(at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure)
  • ABI(at discharge, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ulf Teichgräber

Prof. Dr.

Jena University Hospital

研究点 (44)

Loading locations...

相似试验