Evaluation of Efficacity and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Chronic and Treatment-Resistant Cluster Headache(CH)
- Conditions
- Cluster Headache
- Interventions
- Procedure: setting-up of an electrode in deep brain
- Registration Number
- NCT00662935
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in chronic and treatment-resistant CH. Inclusion criteria are: patients with chronic CH (\>3years), with daily attack and non response to adequate treatment. Electrodes are implanted stereotactically in the postero-inferior hypothalamus. In this crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blinded study, the efficacy of DBS is evaluated using comparison of two one-month sequences: one with stimulation "on" and the other with stimulation "off" (placebo sequence). Efficacy is defined as ≥50% decrease of weekly frequency of CH attacks. After the randomized period, long-term efficacy and safety are evaluated after one year of stimulation in open conditions.
- Detailed Description
Over the past 7 years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used in various centres to treat patients with intractable chronic cluster headache (CH). Results in these non-controlled studies were encouraging but need to be confirmed in controlled conditions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBS in chronic and treatment-resistant CH, in randomized placebo-controlled conditions.
Inclusion criteria are: patients with chronic CH (\>3years), with daily attack and non response to adequate treatment (verapamil up 960 mg/d, lithium with plasmatic level 0.6-1 mEq/ ml, and association of both drugs). After induction of local anaesthesia, electrodes are implanted stereotactically in the postero-inferior hypothalamus according to the previously described coordinates, and connected to a sub-cutaneous generator. In this crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blinded study, the efficacy of DBS is evaluated using comparison of two one-month sequences: one with stimulation "on" and the other with stimulation "off" (considered as the placebo sequence). Primary efficacy is defined as ≥50% decrease of weekly frequency of CH attacks, compared to a prospective run-in pre-implantation period. Safety and tolerability are clinically and biologically assessed. After the randomized period, long-term efficacy and safety are evaluated after one year of stimulation in open conditions.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- between 18 and 65 year old
- suffering from cluster headache since 3 years at least
- not responding to others treatments such as : verapamil, lithium or both of them
- patient with addiction
- pregnancy or feeding women
- contraindication to general anesthetic
- contraindication to MRI
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 setting-up of an electrode in deep brain the sequence of stimulation begins by OFF 1 setting-up of an electrode in deep brain the sequence of stimulation begins by ON
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Decrease (≥50% by reference to a prospective pre-implantation run-in period) of the weekly frequency of cluster headache attacks between treatment and placebo one-month sequences. between treatment and placebo one-month sequences.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intensity of dysautomic dysfunction, acute treatment consumption, quality of life Between treatment and placebo one-month sequences. Between treatment and placebo one-month sequences.