跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02264717
NCT02264717已完成不适用

Dan-NICAD - Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease

University of Aarhus6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,676 人开始时间: 2014年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,676
试验地点
6
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of the CADscore system compared to CCTA and CCA-QCA.

研究概览

简要总结

  1. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CADscore System, a new danish technology that records sounds from turbulence of bloodflow in the coronary vessels.

And secondary:

  1. To determine the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), as secondary tests after detection of obstructive anatomic coronary artery stenosis by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA).
  2. To examine the patient population for bio-genetic markers related to development of arteriosclerosis.
  3. To evaluate virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) computed from coronary angiograms.

详细描述

Primary study CCTA is currently the first choice to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with typical or atypical chest pain. 4500 patients are annually examined with CCTA, in the Central Jutland Region of Denmark, and approximately 80% are discharged after ruling out CAD. CCTA is a diagnostic scan that exposes the patients to radiation, therefore a better risk stratification prior to the test is desirable. The CADscore is a newly developed danish technology that has been tested so far in 1000 patients. An area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC of ROC) of 75-80 has been determined compared to conventional coronary angiography using quantitative coronary angiography (CCA-QCA). This indicates that the CADscore could potentially be used to diagnose CAD as a supplement or risk stratification prior to CCTA.

We aim to evaluate the CADscore in a large clinical trial including 2000 patients that by clinical indication undergo cCTA. After cCTA approximately 20 % (400 patients) will need evaluation by CCA with FFR. CADscore results will be compared to CCTA and CCA-QCA. Secondary, the CADscore will be compared to the results of CCA-FFR and perfusion scans, Cardiac-MRI and SPECT.

Substudies

  1. Perfusion scans

CCTA demonstrates good diagnostic performance for detection and exclusion of anatomic coronary artery stenosis, but several studies have previously shown that CCTA has a low positive predictive value for identification of hemodynamically significant CAD. This emphasizes the need for additional tests to evaluate the severity (or exclusion) of hemodynamically significant CAD. Measurement of FFR during CCA represents the "gold standard" for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. The disadvantage of CCA with FFR is that it is an invasive procedure.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Indication for Cardiac CT

排除标准

  • Age under 40
  • Pregnant, potentially pregnant or breast feeding
  • Contraindication for adenosine (severe asthma, clinical aortic stenosis)
  • Reduced kidney function (eGFR < 40 ml/min)
  • Contraindication for MRI
  • Previous history of allergy to contrast
  • Previous revascularisation procedure

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of the CADscore system compared to CCTA and CCA-QCA.

时间窗: Within one week before or after CCTA

Diagnostic precision will be evaluated as the AUC-ROC. The CADscore will be dichotomized at cut off values of 20,25 and 30 and performance reported with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy. The CADscore system operates with 3 intervals of risk stratification: \<20, 20-30, \>30 (low, intermedia and high risk of cardio vascular disease, respectively) Obstructive CAD is defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis as determined by quantitative analysis of CCA (QCA). Non-Obstructive CAD is defined as no detection of obstructive anatomic coronary artery stenosis by CCTA or stenosis detected by CCTA combined with a evaluation by CCA-QCA demonstrating a luminal stenosis diameter \< 50 %.

次要结局

  • Safety of CADScore Safety of CADScore(One week after the use of CADScore)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of the CADScore system compared to CCA-FFR.(Within four weeks after CADScore)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验