跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02642835
NCT02642835已完成不适用

A Long Term Follow up of Perigee Anterior Meshes Performed for Recurrent Prolapse

Medway NHS Foundation Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 48 人开始时间: 2015年8月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
48
试验地点
1
主要终点
The Number of Participants With a Current Mesh Erosion or Treated for a Mesh Erosion Since Inserted

研究概览

简要总结

Prolapse of the vaginal wall and uterus are common conditions affecting up to 50% of parous women. The socioeconomic, psychological and physical impacts of prolapse are considerable. 11% of women will undergo a surgical repair by the age of 80 years. The commonest compartment affected is the anterior vaginal wall. Unfortunately there is a significant rate of recurrent prolapse or a failure of the primary procedure. This has lead to the introduction of new techniques and the use of different materials to augment the repair. Mesh augmented repairs aim to reduce the rate of recurrent prolapse. However, the use of synthetic mesh is associated with complications which are not found in non mesh repairs. 10% of women will have a mesh complication of which 70% will require a further surgical procedure to manage the complication. There are extra costs associated with purchasing the mesh, with longer operating times to insert the mesh and managing complications caused by the mesh. Balancing the extra risks of mesh surgery against the benefits is probably one of the most contentious issues in urogynaecology at the present time.

Regulatory authorities in the USA (FDA) and UK (MHRA) have become increasingly interested in the use of mesh to support the vaginal wall in prolapse surgery due to risks and complications being reported. To date there is little evidence regarding the long term safety and efficacy of anterior mesh repairs. This study aims to rectify this deficiency for Perigee.

详细描述

This will be a consecutive cohort study of patients identified from a surgical database of Perigees performed in a single centre. All patients will have had the procedure performed between 2007 and 2011. This will be a single centre study. The principle investigator has both electronic and hand written records of all Perigee repairs performed since the introduction of this technique in 2007. The patients will be identified from both the paper and electronic databases and cross referenced.

After obtained appropriate ethical approval, patients identified as having a perigee mesh inserted will be asked to attend Medway Hospital for a full clinical evaluation. They will be sent a letter with an appointment to come to the hospital. They will be asked to complete the Pelvic floor distress inventory questionnaire to assess their symptoms. They will have a pelvic examination to determine if they have any mesh erosion and will undergo a POP-Q score. This visit will take 1 hour.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women undergoing a perigee procedure after January 2007

排除标准

  • Patient having non mesh repairs over the same time scale

结局指标

主要结局

The Number of Participants With a Current Mesh Erosion or Treated for a Mesh Erosion Since Inserted

时间窗: 1 hour

clinic visit. 5 patients were interviewed by phone and were not examined - hence this figure is out of 43 not 48.

次要结局

  • Number of Participants Who Needed Surgical Mesh Removal for Erosion(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Who Needed Reoperations for Pain(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Intraoperative Complications(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Complaining of a Bulge. Recurrent Prolapse(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Requiring Treatment for Recurrent Prolapse - Prolapse in the Same Part of the Vagina(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants With no Physical Evidence of Recurrent Prolapse as Determined by Physical Examination(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Who Developed New Stress Incontinence(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Who Underwent Reoperation for Prolapse in a Different Compartment(1 hour)
  • Number of Participants Who Rated Their Improvement as Better or Very Much Better(1 hour)

研究者

发起方
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Professor Jonathan Duckett

Consultant Urogynaecologist

Medway NHS Foundation Trust

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验