跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04878744
NCT04878744已完成不适用

A Feasibility Study Assessing a Green Prescription Version of a Novel App-based Intervention to Improve Wellbeing in Patients With Common Mental Health Problems

University of Sheffield2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 93 人开始时间: 2017年4月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
93
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of participants who write daily notes

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to understand how different aspects of city living affect wellbeing. The investigators hope that the results from the study will inform town planners and policy makers about how city spaces can be designed for better health and wellbeing of residents. What? This study will test the use of a new intervention amongst adults with common mental health difficulties such as depression and anxiety. The intervention will be a smartphone app which will prompt users twice a day to notice and record the good things about green spaces or built spaces around Sheffield. Previous research has shown that engaging with the natural environment can benefit health and mental wellbeing. Who? Adults over 18 years old, who have a mild to moderate common mental health problem (such as depression or anxiety), and who own a smartphone will be able to participate. Where? Participants will use the app as part of their day to day routine as they travel around Sheffield and the surrounding area. The app will prompt them to notice green or built spaces around them. How? The app will be delivered as a 'green prescription' which means that health professionals will tell their patients about the intervention. If patients choose to take part, they will be allocated at random to either noticing the good things about green spaces or the good things about built spaces. This is to control for whether noticing green space or noticing other aspects of city life affects health and wellbeing. Patients will complete questionnaires about health, mental wellbeing and their feelings about nature, before, after and 3 months after using the app for one month.

详细描述

The proposed feasibility study is part of a larger programme of research which asks broadly how the investigators can improve health and mental wellbeing through urban nature. The feasibility study forms part of Work Package 3 delivered by the University of Derby. The main study in work package 3 will recruit over 1,000 Sheffield residents to evaluate an app-based intervention to improve wellbeing through prompting people to notice the good things about nature. For the feasibility study, the investigators will pilot a green prescription version of this intervention with 100 adults who have common mental health difficulties. The feasibility study asks the question of how feasible it is to recruit patients to the study using a green prescription method of clinician signposting (measured through referral numbers and referral source). It also asks whether there are any health and mental wellbeing benefits to adults with common mental health problems (measured through health and mental wellbeing questionnaires completed at pre, post and 3 months follow-up).

People who are exposed to nature, or feel connected with it, present higher levels of general health and subjective wellbeing. Individuals with mental health problems have been shown to particularly benefit from nature-based interventions . In a recent Natural England report, evidence from a range of nature-based interventions for mental health patients and found the following benefits: i) reduced depression and anxiety; ii) increased positive affect; iii) increased social contact; and iv) increased mental wellbeing.

At present, the knowledge about the beneficial effects of nature is insufficient to be applied in a systematic way in health promotion and urban planning. There is a need to move beyond cross-sectional evidence and natural experiments. Work package 3 aims to fill this research gap through a largescale controlled study, which will employ a robust quasi-experimental methodology to look at the health and wellbeing benefits of engaging the public with urban nature. To go beyond cross-sectional data, the study will randomise participants to an app-based intervention which will either prompt them to notice the good things about green spaces or to an active control condition which will prompt them to notice the good things about built spaces.

As part of work package 3 the investigators will conduct a feasibility study assessing a green prescription version of the app-based intervention for adults with common mental health problems. This will help estimate the wider potential for using the nature-based intervention in a clinical population. 'The natural environment has potential to offer cost-effective solutions to address health inequalities and produce positive physical and mental health outcomes'. Some of the data collected will be used to estimate QALYs and to look at cost utility of the intervention in this group of patients.

The research proposal was developed by the principal investigator (Prof. Anna Jorgensen, Sheffield University) and collaborators from Sheffield University, Derby University and Herriot-Watt University. The team is multidisciplinary encompassing public health, landscape, architecture and design, psychology and mental health, and economics. Internal peer-review was sought from experts in this field of research before submitting the research bid and the bid was reviewed and approved for funding by the Natural Environment Research Council.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults over 18 years old
  • Having a mild to moderate common mental health problem (such as depression and/or anxiety)
  • Owning a smartphone

排除标准

  • Aged under 18 years old
  • Do not have a mild to moderate common mental health problem (depression and/or anxiety)
  • Do not own a smartphone

结局指标

主要结局

Number of participants who write daily notes

时间窗: post-intervention at 1 month

Whether the participant engages with the app at least 50% of the time by writing notes about the good things they noticed when prompted daily by the app.

Change in Nature Relatedness scale (Nisbet & Zelenski 2008) between baseline and post-intervention

时间窗: Baseline and post-intervention at 1 month

This is a measure of connection to nature. Scores range from 1-30 with higher scores indicating greater nature connection.

Change in Engagement with Natural Beauty scale (Diessner et al. 2008) between baseline and post-intervention

时间窗: Baseline and post-intervention at 1 month

This is a measure of noticing natures beauty. Scores range from 1-28, with higher scores indicating greater appreciation of natures beauty.

Change in EQ-5D-European Quality of Life scale (Rabin, 2001) between baseline and post-intervention

时间窗: Baseline and post-intervention at 1 month

This is a measure of physical and mental wellbeing. Questions are scored individually and there are four questions. Lower scores indicate better health, so a maximum score of 1 per question indicates optimal health. There is also a visual analogue scale scored 0-100 with 100 indicating the best health score.

Number of participants completing the study

时间窗: post-intervention at 1 month

Whether the participant remains in the study until post-intervention measures

Change in Inclusion of self in nature scale (Schultz, 2001) between baseline and post-intervention

时间窗: Baseline and post-intervention at 1 month

This is a single item measure of connection to nature. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater nature connection.

Change in Types of positive affect scale (Gilbert et al., 2009) between baseline and post-intervention

时间窗: Baseline and post-intervention at 1 month

This scale measures activated and relaxed constructs of positive affect. Higher scores indicate greater positive affect. There are three subscales of Relaxed positive affect (scores range 0-48), Safe positive affect (scores range 0-32) and Activated positive affect (scores range 0-32).

Details about participants visit to green/built spaces

时间窗: post-intervention at 1 month

4 single questions ask about 1) the variety of wildlife or how built-up the area was (responses are none or lots, 2) how that place made them feel (participants respond by clicking a smiley face or a sad face), 3)who they were with (response options include no one, friends/family/partner, Coworker/course mate, in a crowd, pet or other) , and 4) what they were doing (response options include walking, exercising, relaxing, travelling, other).

Change in Recovering Quality of Life scale (Brazier et al., 2014) from baseline to post-intervention

时间窗: Baseline and post-intervention at 1 month

This is a mental health specific quality of life scale. Possible scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Anna Jorgensen

Professor

University of Sheffield

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验