MedPath

Effects of Occlusal Splint and Therapeutic Home Exercises

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Neuropathic Pain
Somatic Pain
Quality of Life
Interventions
Other: Temporomandibular joint Exercises
Other: Mandibular oral occlusal splint
Registration Number
NCT04116255
Lead Sponsor
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

In this randomized controlled study, investigators planned to investigate the efficacy of oral occlusive splint and therapeutic home exercises in increasing the quality of life and reducing somatic and neuropathic pain in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction, determine their effects on other clinical data, and report long-term outcomes

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study to compare the efficacy of oral occlusive splint and therapeutic home exercises in increasing the quality of life and reducing somatic and neuropathic pain in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction and report long-term outcomes.

One hundred and one patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: The first group received a mandibular oral occlusal splint and the second group was given a home exercise program for the temporomandibular joint. The patients were evaluated based on their maximum mouth opening, visual analog scale, short-form McGill pain questionnaire, painDETECT, oral health-related quality of health and hospital anxiety and depression scale scores at the beginning of treatment and at the end of the first and sixth months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
101
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders for more than one month
  • Being aged 18 to 60 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of trauma to temporomandibular joint or face
  • History of an inflammatory joint disease
  • Chronic analgesic use lasting more than six months
  • Previous treatment for temporomandibular joint disorders
  • History of a major psychiatric, neurological or neuromuscular disease (Lambert-Eaton syndrome, orofacial or tardive dyskinesia, myasthenia gravis)
  • Migraine diagnosis
  • Chronic headache or neck pain
  • Chronic pain syndrome
  • Pregnancy
  • Disc displacement with or without reduction

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
exercises groupTemporomandibular joint Exercisesexercises group apply regular therapeutic home exercises programme
splint groupMandibular oral occlusal splintsplint group use mandibular oral occlusal splint
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
painDETECTsix months

This scale is to evaluate the presence of neuropathic pain. PainDETECT incorporated an easy to use, patient- base questionnaire with nine items that do not require a clinical examination. There are seven weighted sensory descriptor items (''never'' to ''very strongly'') and two items relating to the spatial and temporal characteristics of the individual pain pattern. minimum score is 0 points and maximum score is 30 points. Patients with a total score of 12 or less are considered to have no neuropathic pain component. If the total score is between 13 and 18, it is assumed that a neuropathic component may be present although the result is not certain, and scores of 19 and above indicate the presence of a neuropathic pain component.

Visual analog scalesix months

The visual analogue scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Ranges from 0 to 10 points, where the former indicates 'no pain' and the latter 'worst pain ever'. The patients were asked to mark the point that best represented the level of pain they experienced.

Oral health-related quality of healthsix months

This scale measures how an individual's oral health affects their quality of life and overall health, and how that they personally perceive this situation. A scoring known as oral health impact profile-14 is used, in which functional disability, physical pain, psychological disability, physical, psychological and social disability, and handicap measures are evaluated using two questions each. As the total score increases, the severity of the problem increases and the quality of life decreases.The minimum and maximum scores of this assessment tool is 0 and 56, respectively.

Pain-free maximum mouth openingsix months

This was measured in millimeters at the baseline and at each follow-up visit. The patients were asked to open their mouths as much as they could without having pain. Central incisors were measured in millimeters three times consecutively, and the highest measurement was recorded

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short-form McGill pain questionnairesix months

This is a multidimensional scale containing items that investigate the sensory and perceptual dimension of pain and examines the relationship between pain and anxiety, as well as pain intensity over time. The questionnaire is completed by patients.The main component of the short form McGill pain questionnaire consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1= mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors. From this assessment scale, patients can score a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 112.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ankara Training and Research Hospital

🇹🇷

Ankara, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath