MedPath

The Procedural Success and Complication Rate of the Left Distal Radial Approach

Completed
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Radial Artery Injury at Wrist and Hand Level
Interventions
Procedure: ldTRA
Registration Number
NCT03292367
Lead Sponsor
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Brief Summary

Left distal transradial approach (ldTRA) can be an attractive alternative route for left radial and right radial artery. Recently, Ferdinand Kiemeneij reported the feasibility and safety of the use of ldTRA. But, there is few studies focused on this issue. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess the feasibility and safety of the ldTRA for CAG and PCI.

Detailed Description

Femoral artery has been traditionally used as a standard route for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, the frequency of use of transradial approach (TRA) is increasing. TRA has several advantages in terms of more comfortable feeling, immediate ambulation, less bleeding complication and decreased mortality rate compared to transfemoral approach (TFA). 2015 ESC guidelines recommend to use of radial artery in order to reduce bleeding complication and mortality. But, most operators tend to prefer right radial approach (RRA) for the access route, because they are usually right-handed and feel more comfortable in the use of right radial artery. Particularly when the patient is obese or the operator's height is short or has a herniated disc on neck or waist, the discomfort may become greater.

In other hand, left radial approach (LRA) have several advantages. Left brachial artery or subclavian artery is less tortuous than right side. The manipulation of catheter is similar with femoral approach. Also, since most patients are right-handed, compression after LRA leads to greater comfort for the patient.

In comparison to the convenience of the patient and procedure, comparative studies on clinical outcomes showed similar results for both RRA and LRA. But LRA may be more at risk for radiation. This is because the operator has to lean more toward the patient for the procedure, which can result in increased radiation exposure.

Recently, the left distal radial artery approach (ldTRA) has been introduced as an alternative to feasibility and safety while satisfying both patient and operator convenience. The left palm is positioned facing the floor at the left groin. Left distal radial artery is punctured at the level of anatomical snuffbox. Ferdinand Kiemeneij reported that CAG and PCI were successfully performed in 70 patients.

There are no nerve and vein in the anatomical snuffbox. And distal radial artery is located at superficial area. So, there may be potential advantage to reduce bleeding complication and nerve injury. Moreover, ldTRA can be an alternative method for the patient requiring arteriovenous fistula and for the patient preparing coronary artery bypass graft because there is no injury of left radial artery.

The patients have potential bleeding risk because dual antiplatelet agents (aspirin 300mg and clopidogrel 300mg) and more than 3,000 units of unfractionated heparin should be loaded for CAG and PCI. The effective hemostasis method has not yet been established after ldTRA. Therefore, it is important to establish effective hemostasis method and timing. However, like TRA, ldTRA requires a learning curve to be mastered, and it cannot be performed if the pulse is not palpable. There are few studies related to ldTRA. The purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess the feasibility and safety of the ldTRA for CAG and PCI.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients over 20 years old requiring coronary angiography
  • Patients who are palpable left distal radial artery
  • Patients who agreed to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who are not palpable left distal radial artery
  • Patients who are positive in Modified Allen's test (suspicious of occlusion of ulnar artery)
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients who are not appropriate for the study

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ldTRAldTRAPatients who are planned to perform coronary angiography will be enrolled via left distal radial artery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success rate of coronary angiography1 year

The frequency of success rate of coronary angiography (%)

Success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention1 year

The frequency of success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (%)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success rate of puncture of left distal radial artery1 year

The frequency rate of successful puncture of left distal radial artery (%)

Diameter of left distal radial artery1 year

Measured by ultrasonography before procedure (mm)

The degree of patient's satisfaction1 year

Questionnaire using visual analogue scale for the pain and satisfaction of overall procedure especially focused on the left distal radial approach (Maximum 10 score, Minimum 0 score)

Hemostasis duration at the puncture site1 year

Hemostasis duration after procedure (minute)

Complications at the puncture site1 year

The frequency rate of complications at the puncture site (%)

Exposure time of radiation1 year

Total exposure time of radiation during procedure (minute)

Dose of radiation1 year

Dose of radiation during procedure (Gy-cm2)

Procedure time1 year

Procedure time including coronary angiograph and percutaneous coronary intervention, if performed (minute)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

🇰🇷

Wonju, Gangwon-do, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath