MedPath

Ultra-protective Pulmonary Ventilation Supported by Low Flow ECCO2R for Severe ARDS

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
Interventions
Other: Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation
Device: Prismalung
Other: Ultra-protective ventilation
Registration Number
NCT02252094
Lead Sponsor
National University Health System, Singapore
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the use of ultra-protective ventilation, where very low ventilation volumes are used, in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) meeting criteria to nurse in the prone position. Half the patients will receive ultra-protective ventilation support by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, while the other half will receive conventional lung protective ventilation.

Detailed Description

Current best practices for management of severe ARDS include lung protective ventilation and nursing in the prone position. However, the best lung protective strategy is not currently established and using smaller ventilation volumes than standard lung protective ventilation suggest lung recovery is improved.

Application of smaller ventilation volumes requires extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, using a device similar to a dialysis to remove carbon dioxide directly from the blood. One such device in the Prismalung, it removes blood through a catheter, much like a dialysis catheter, pumps it through a gas exchange cartridge which removes carbon dioxide. The gas exchange cartridge functions in a similar way to a dialysis filter, except it allow gases to pass through, unlike dialysis filters which allow passage of fluid and small molecules.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria
  • Admitted to MICU with respiratory failure and intubated
  • ARDS criteria per Berlin definition
  • PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 mmHg for > 6 hours with FiO2 ≥0.5
  • Expected to require mechanical ventilation for >48 hours
  • Reversible disease
Exclusion Criteria
  • Anticoagulation contraindicated
  • Proven HIT
  • Unable to obtain central venous access
  • Refractory hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ≤80 after recruitment and proning) or other indication for ECMO
  • Home oxygen use
  • Severe COPD
  • Interstitial lung disease
  • > 7 days of mechanical ventilation
  • Immunocompromised patient (bone marrow, untreated HIV, PJP)
  • Advanced malignancy with life expectancy ≤ 6months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional lung protective ventilationConventional Lung Protective VentilationLung protective ventilation (6ml/kg predicted body weight). All other interventions per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol
Ultra-protective ventilationUltra-protective ventilationUltra-protective ventilation (\</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight) targeting plateau pressure of \</= 25 cmH2O, supported by Prismalung. All other intervention per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol
Ultra-protective ventilationPrismalungUltra-protective ventilation (\</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight) targeting plateau pressure of \</= 25 cmH2O, supported by Prismalung. All other intervention per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Plateau PressureDuration of ventilation for severe ARDS, expected average time 10 days

Ability to achieve a plateau pressure of \</=25 cmH20 in the intervention arm

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Enrolment ratesFirst 48 hours
Barotrauma complicationsDuration of ICU stay
Incidence of dialysis in ICU, and ability to successfully initiateDuration of ICU stay
Length of hospital stayDuration of patient stay in hospital
Cardiac ImagingOne data set per patient during first 72 hours

Echocardiogram data will be collected before prone position, after prone positioning and following initiation of ultra-protective ventilation

Ability to successfully proneDuration of ICU stay
MortalityMonitored for 3 months

ICU mortality, hospital mortality, 30 day, 60 day and 90 day mortality

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal related complicationsDuration of severe ARDS, expected average time frame 10 days

Complications or adverse events related to ECCO2R and associated anticoagulation

Ventilator free days28 days
Ventilation parametersDuration of mechanical ventilation

Data download from mechanical ventilation

Ventilator associated pneumonia ratesDuration of ICU stay
Number of patient meeting proning criteria in each groupDuration of ICU stay
Lung recruitabilityDuration of ICU stay
Length of stay in ICU stayDuration of patient stay in ICU, expected average stay 2 weeks
Biomarkers of Pulmonary InflammationDay 0, 4 and 7

Serum will be drawn and stored for pulmonary biomarkers analysis at the above time points

All severe adverse eventsDuration of ICU stay (anticipate average stay 1-2 weeks)
Incidence of referrals for ECMODuration of ICU stay
Rate and reasons for declining consent to study participationFirst 48 hours

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

National University Hospital

🇸🇬

Singapore, Singapore

Ng Teng Fong General Hospital

🇸🇬

Singapore, Singapore

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath