Ultra-protective Pulmonary Ventilation Supported by Low Flow ECCO2R for Severe ARDS
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult
- Interventions
- Other: Conventional Lung Protective VentilationDevice: PrismalungOther: Ultra-protective ventilation
- Registration Number
- NCT02252094
- Lead Sponsor
- National University Health System, Singapore
- Brief Summary
This study evaluates the use of ultra-protective ventilation, where very low ventilation volumes are used, in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) meeting criteria to nurse in the prone position. Half the patients will receive ultra-protective ventilation support by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, while the other half will receive conventional lung protective ventilation.
- Detailed Description
Current best practices for management of severe ARDS include lung protective ventilation and nursing in the prone position. However, the best lung protective strategy is not currently established and using smaller ventilation volumes than standard lung protective ventilation suggest lung recovery is improved.
Application of smaller ventilation volumes requires extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, using a device similar to a dialysis to remove carbon dioxide directly from the blood. One such device in the Prismalung, it removes blood through a catheter, much like a dialysis catheter, pumps it through a gas exchange cartridge which removes carbon dioxide. The gas exchange cartridge functions in a similar way to a dialysis filter, except it allow gases to pass through, unlike dialysis filters which allow passage of fluid and small molecules.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 8
- Admitted to MICU with respiratory failure and intubated
- ARDS criteria per Berlin definition
- PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 mmHg for > 6 hours with FiO2 ≥0.5
- Expected to require mechanical ventilation for >48 hours
- Reversible disease
- Anticoagulation contraindicated
- Proven HIT
- Unable to obtain central venous access
- Refractory hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ≤80 after recruitment and proning) or other indication for ECMO
- Home oxygen use
- Severe COPD
- Interstitial lung disease
- > 7 days of mechanical ventilation
- Immunocompromised patient (bone marrow, untreated HIV, PJP)
- Advanced malignancy with life expectancy ≤ 6months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Conventional lung protective ventilation Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation Lung protective ventilation (6ml/kg predicted body weight). All other interventions per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol Ultra-protective ventilation Ultra-protective ventilation Ultra-protective ventilation (\</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight) targeting plateau pressure of \</= 25 cmH2O, supported by Prismalung. All other intervention per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol Ultra-protective ventilation Prismalung Ultra-protective ventilation (\</= 3ml/kg predicted body weight) targeting plateau pressure of \</= 25 cmH2O, supported by Prismalung. All other intervention per intensive care unit standardised ARDS management protocol
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Plateau Pressure Duration of ventilation for severe ARDS, expected average time 10 days Ability to achieve a plateau pressure of \</=25 cmH20 in the intervention arm
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Enrolment rates First 48 hours Barotrauma complications Duration of ICU stay Incidence of dialysis in ICU, and ability to successfully initiate Duration of ICU stay Length of hospital stay Duration of patient stay in hospital Cardiac Imaging One data set per patient during first 72 hours Echocardiogram data will be collected before prone position, after prone positioning and following initiation of ultra-protective ventilation
Ability to successfully prone Duration of ICU stay Mortality Monitored for 3 months ICU mortality, hospital mortality, 30 day, 60 day and 90 day mortality
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal related complications Duration of severe ARDS, expected average time frame 10 days Complications or adverse events related to ECCO2R and associated anticoagulation
Ventilator free days 28 days Ventilation parameters Duration of mechanical ventilation Data download from mechanical ventilation
Ventilator associated pneumonia rates Duration of ICU stay Number of patient meeting proning criteria in each group Duration of ICU stay Lung recruitability Duration of ICU stay Length of stay in ICU stay Duration of patient stay in ICU, expected average stay 2 weeks Biomarkers of Pulmonary Inflammation Day 0, 4 and 7 Serum will be drawn and stored for pulmonary biomarkers analysis at the above time points
All severe adverse events Duration of ICU stay (anticipate average stay 1-2 weeks) Incidence of referrals for ECMO Duration of ICU stay Rate and reasons for declining consent to study participation First 48 hours
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
National University Hospital
🇸🇬Singapore, Singapore
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
🇸🇬Singapore, Singapore