MedPath

CyclASol for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Dry-eye Disease (DED)

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Dry Eye Syndromes
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02617667
Lead Sponsor
Novaliq GmbH
Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of two different dose levels of CyclASol Ophthalmic Solutions to placebo (vehicle) and Restasis for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (DED).

Detailed Description

This phase 2 study explored the safety, efficacy and tolerability of two CyclASol concentrations as one drop twice daily versus vehicle (placebo). In addition to the masked vehicle control arm, an open-label comparator arm consisting of Restasis was included.

The study explored a range of signs and symptoms of DED to gain an understanding of the possible treatment effects in comparison to vehicle and estimation of effect sizes. In line with current treatment guidelines, the proposed phase 2 population consisted of patients suffering from moderate to severe DED.

The primary treatment comparisons in this study were between the two CyclASol concentrations versus vehicle for the sign variable total corneal fluorescein staining and the symptom variable dryness severity visual analogue scale at day 113. All other comparisons between treatments groups were considered secondary analyses.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
207
Inclusion Criteria
  • Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ) document
  • Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes
  • Current use of over-the-counter and/or prescription eye drops for dry eye symptoms
  • Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including participation in all study assessments and visits
Exclusion Criteria
  • Women who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
  • Unwillingness to submit a blood pregnancy test at screening and at the last visit (or early termination visit) if of childbearing potential, or unwillingness to use acceptable means of birth control
  • Clinically significant slit-lamp findings or abnormal lid anatomy at screening
  • DED secondary to scarring or ocular or periocular malignancy
  • History of herpetic keratitis
  • Active ocular allergies or ocular allergies that are expected to be active during the study period
  • Ongoing ocular or systemic infection at screening or baseline
  • Wear of contact lenses within 3 months prior to screening or anticipated use of contact lenses during the study
  • History of no response to previous topical Cyclosporine A and/or use of topical Cyclosporine A within 6 months prior to screening
  • Intra-ocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within the previous 6 months, or have any planned ocular and/or lid surgeries over the study period
  • Presence of an uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Presence of a known allergy and/or sensitivity to the study drug or its components

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 2Cyclosporine ACyclosporine A solution (dose-level 2) in vehicle
CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 1Cyclosporine ACyclosporine A solution (dose-level 1) in vehicle
RestasisCyclosporine ACyclosporine A 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionPlaceboVehicle only
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining at 113 DaysBaseline to 113 Days

The primary analysis and objective of the study was to compare the two CyclASol groups versus vehicle (all blinded treatment arms) for one sign and one symptom endpoint. The open label active comparator arm was not included in the primary analysis to reduce the number of comparisons. The sign endpoint was the change from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining at day 113. The cornea is divided into five regions: central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal. Each region is graded from 0-3 based on the National Eye Institute scale, where 0 indicates no staining and 3 maximal staining. The total score is the sum of all these regions. The maximum score for each eye is 15.

Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Dryness Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 113 DaysBaseline to 113 Days

The primary analysis and objective of the study was to compare the the two CyclASol groups versus vehicle (all blinded treatment arms) for one sign and one symptom endpoint. The open label active comparator arm was not included in the primary analysis to reduce the number of comparisons. Furthermore, the open label character could have had an impact on patient reported outcomes. The symptom endpoint was the change from baseline in severity of dryness VAS at Day 113. Dryness severity was rated from 0 to 100%, where 0% corresponds to "no dryness" and 100% corresponds to "maximum dryness".

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CYS-002 Investigational Site

🇺🇸

Quincy, Massachusetts, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath