Functional Outcome After Dual Mobility Cups Total Hip Replacement Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Fracture Neck of Femur in Active Elderly Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 33
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- functional outcome using the Harris hip score
研究概览
简要总结
Bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BA) has long been the preferred treatment and is performed in most fracture neck of femur (FNF) cases. It is justified by the reasonable operative time, low blood loss and acceptable functional outcomes. The dual mobility cup total hip replacement (DMTHA) has emerged as a relevant alternative to BA. Since then, there is an on-going debate on the best implant to use. Age, co-morbidities, patient independence and potential surgical complications must be considered when deciding between implants. The risk of dislocation is a crucial factor because of its important consequences. The investigators evaluated the functional and mechanical outcomes of BA versus DMTHA in FNF in active elderly patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •active patients
- •displaced fracture neck of femur
- •age from 60 to 80
排除标准
- •ipsilateral previous hip surgery
- •grade 3 hip osteoarthritis according to tonnis classifiction
- •dysplastic acetabulum
结局指标
主要结局
functional outcome using the Harris hip score
时间窗: 2 years
hip joint range of motion and activities of daily living
rate of dislocation
时间窗: 2 years
postoperative prosthesis dislocation
次要结局
- operative time in minutes(45 minutes to 2 hours)
- blood loss in cc(during the procedure)
研究者
Tony Maher
Assistant lecturer
Ain Shams University
