跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06790433
NCT06790433已完成不适用

Comparison Between the Dentapen and Vibraject: a Randomized Clinical Study on the Administration of Local Anaesthesia in Adult Patients.

Riyadh Elm University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2023年10月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
Heart rate

研究概览

简要总结

A split-mouth, controlled trial aimed to assess patient-reported pain levels during local anaesthesia administration to the buccal side of the maxillary posterior teeth using Vibraject-assisted injection and the Dentapen® system in its ramp-up mode.

Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale immediately following each injection, and heart rate measurements were recorded before and after each injection. Patient preferences for injection methods were also documented

详细描述

Steps of the Experiment

The experimental protocol was meticulously structured to evaluate the efficacy and patient response to two different local anaesthetic delivery systems. The steps were as follows:

Step I: Before administering a local anaesthetic, the patient's heart rate was checked with a pulse oximeter (Beurer Finger Pulse Oximeter). The results were recorded.

Step II: Patients were randomly assigned to get the injection of local anaesthetic at their initial appointment either with the Dentapen system (ramp-up) or with Vibraject. To simplify the protocol, a 27-gauge needle was used for all dental injections with bevel side directly headed to the injected site.

Step III: In the next appointment, after of one hour on a digital timer, the other technique was used for the same patients on the other side. Hence, each patient was given local anaesthesia twice, once with the Dentapen system (ramp-up mode) and once with Vibraject.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Individuals classified under American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I and II, indicating a healthy or mild systemic disease status.
  • •Individuals aged from 18 up to 65 years, encompassing both male and female patients.
  • •Individuals who required local anesthetic injections bilaterally in the buccal side of the upper posterior teeth. These injections were necessary for various dental procedures, including restorative, endodontic, or prosthodontic treatments, and volunteers as well were to be administered across both sides of upper posterior teeth.
  • •Individuals must be in good health, not currently taking any medication, and have no contraindications to the use of local anesthesia.
  • •Individuals who have the ability to understand both oral and written instructions, ensuring effective communication and comprehension throughout the study.

排除标准

  • •Individuals with allergies to local anesthetics, this is to prevent adverse reactions.
  • •Pregnant or nursing women, this is to avoid any potential risks to their health or that of their infants.
  • •Individuals who were actively taking drugs that could alter pain perception or anxiety levels, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, or antidepressants. This was to ensure that the study's findings on pain perception were not influenced by external substances
  • •Individuals with heavy alcohol consumption. .
  • •Patients with active pathologies at the injection site, this is to avoid complications and to ensure the accuracy of the study's results.
  • •Individuals who could not commit to the study's schedule or were unable to give informed consent. This ensured that all participants were fully aware of and agreeable to the study's procedures and requirements.
  • •Patients who required intravenous sedation for their dental procedures.

研究组 & 干预措施

Vibraject

Active Comparator

Participants will receive dental injection using Vibraject

干预措施: Vibraject (Device)

Dentapen

Active Comparator

Participants will receive dental injection using Dentapen

干预措施: Dentapen (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Heart rate

时间窗: Immediately after the intervention/procedure (dental anesthesia)

Heart rate was measured for the participants using a pulse oximeter

Pain rating scale

时间窗: 3 minutes after the intervention/procedure (dental anesthesia)

After each local anesthesia injection operation, the patient was asked to use the Visual Analogue Scale to score the intensity of reported pain. It is a scale of pain composed of 10 scores from 0 to 10, a higher score indicates greater pain intensity (worse outcome).

Participant's future preference

时间窗: 5 minutes after the intervention/procedure (dental anesthesia)

The participants were asked using a simple questionnaire to state their preference for the delivery system of future injections

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验