EUCTR2005-004798-60-DE
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A one-year multicentre, international, randomised, double-blind study with comparison of benfluorex (150 mg od to 150 mg tid) versus pioglitazone (30 mg od to 45 mg od) in combination with sulfonylurea administered orally for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
I.R.I.S. Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier0 sites840 target enrollmentFebruary 3, 2006
DrugsACTOS
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- I.R.I.S. Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier
- Enrollment
- 840
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 14 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •\- Male or female aged \>\=35 years and \=\< 80 years,
- •\- BMI between 25 and 40 kg/m2 (inclusive),
- •\- out\-patients with type 2 diabetes,
- •\- in monotherapy with a sulfonylurea at stable dose for at least 3 consecutive months prior to the selection visit and at dose \>\= 50% of the maximal recommended one,
- •\- HbA1c between 7% and 10% inclusive.
- •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
- •Number of subjects for this age range:
- •F.1\.2 Adults (18\-64 years) yes
- •F.1\.2\.1 Number of subjects for this age range
- •F.1\.3 Elderly (\>\=65 years) yes
Exclusion Criteria
- •\- Type 1 diabetes
- •\- Known Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults,
- •\- Type 2 diabetes treated in the previous 3 months with an oral hypoglycaemic agent other than a sulfonylurea,
- •\- Type 2 diabetes treated with more than 1 oral hypoglycaemic agent in the previous 3 months,
- •\- Insulin treatment in the previous year, except short term treatment for exceptional reason such as surgery
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A one-year multicentre, international, randomised, double-blind study with comparison of benfluorex (150 mg od to 150 mg tid) versus pioglitazone (30 mg od to 45 mg od) in combination with sulfonylurea administered orally for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.Type II DiabetesMedDRA version: 7.0Level: PTClassification code 10012613EUCTR2005-004798-60-CZI.R.I.S. Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier840
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
A 24-week, multicenter, international, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open-label, comparative study of insulin glargine versus liraglutide in insulin-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents and not adequately controlled, followed by a 24-week extension period with insulin glargine for patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide - EAGLE (Efficacy Assessment of insulin Glargine versus LiraglutidE after oral agents failure)Type 2 diabetes not adequately controlledMedDRA version: 12.1Level: LLTClassification code 10063624Term: Type II diabetes mellitus inadequate controlEUCTR2010-018437-21-FISANOFI AVENTIS GROUPE930
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A 24-week, multicenter, international, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open-label, comparative study of insulin glargine versus liraglutide in insulin-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents and not adequately controlled, followed by a 24-week extension period with insulin glargine for patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide - EAGLE (Efficacy Assessment of insulin Glargine versus LiraglutidE after oral agents failure)Type 2 diabetes not adequately controlledMedDRA version: 14.1Level: LLTClassification code 10063624Term: Type II diabetes mellitus inadequate controlSystem Organ Class: 10027433 - Metabolism and nutrition disordersEUCTR2010-018437-21-CZSANOFI AVENTIS GROUPE930
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A 24-week, multicenter, international, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open-label, comparative study of insulin glargine versus liraglutide in insulin-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents and not adequately controlled, followed by a 24-week extension period with insulin glargine for patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide - EAGLE (Efficacy Assessment of insulin Glargine versus LiraglutidE after oral agents failure)EUCTR2010-018437-21-SESANOFI AVENTIS GROUPE930
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
A 24-week, multicenter, international, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, open-label, comparative study of insulin glargine versus liraglutide in insulin-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents and not adequately controlled, followed by a 24-week extension period with insulin glargine for patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide - EAGLE (Efficacy Assessment of insulin Glargine versus LiraglutidE after oral agents failure)Type 2 diabetes not adequately controlledMedDRA version: 13.1Level: LLTClassification code 10063624Term: Type II diabetes mellitus inadequate controlSystem Organ Class: 10027433 - Metabolism and nutrition disordersEUCTR2010-018437-21-ATSANOFI AVENTIS GROUPE930