Coaching Language to Improve Endoscopy Training Quality
- Conditions
- ColonoscopyEducation, Medical
- Registration Number
- NCT05674500
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized control study is to determine if the use of standardized coaching language by faculty trainers for teaching colonoscopy is associated with improved colonoscopy performance. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* If the use of standardized coaching language is effective in improving colonoscopy training?
* If the use of standardized coaching language influences the clarity of instructions by the faculty trainers during colonoscopy teaching Participants will take part in simulated colonoscopy teaching encounter using a virtual reality simulator for 1 hour in 2 different sessions 2 weeks apart.
Researchers will compare 2 groups of faculty trainers to to see if the standardized coaching language effects the colonoscopy training quality.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 25
- Faculty members who are endoscopy trainers in either pediatric or adult gastroenterology division at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center or Children's Medical Center, Dallas
- Fellow trainees in pediatric or adult gastroenterology division at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center or Children's Medical Center, Dallas
- Advanced endoscopy fellows
- Fellows beyond Post-Graduate Year-6 (PGY-6)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in colonoscopy performance Change from Baseline colonoscopy performance at 2 weeks The de-identified video-recording of the simulated colonoscopy will be assessed by blinded external rater.
This will be done using another colonoscopy assessment form with strong validity evidence - 8 'Procedure' items from the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy (JAG) Colonoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) form. This is a supervision-based scale (measuring from 1 to 4). Since this is also a competency based tool with a checklist, it has a rating scale with no maximum score.
To ensure blinding, only the trainee's gloved hands will be seen, and the videos used for assessment of colonoscopy performance will not have sound to control for any effects the faculty instruction may have on the ratings of performance.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Cognitive load Change from Baseline cognitive load at 2 weeks Printed forms will be given to all participants immediately after the pre-and post-sessions to measure the cognitive load.
Cognitive Load Index for Colonoscopy (for trainees ONLY): A measure of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load related to performing colonoscopy. Fifteen items that are applicable to the simulation will be rated. Given the nature of this scale, it will be administered to trainees only. Scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree).Change in 'Red-out' time Change from baseline time in red-out at 2 weeks The percentage of procedure time during which the endoscope tip (camera) was against the mucosa of the virtual bowel (i.e., there was no proper visualization of the bowel mucosa - appears as 'reddened out screen', aka 'red-out'), as auto-generated automatically by the colonoscopy simulator. The percentage ranges from 0 to 100.
Change in time to cecum Change from baseline time to cecum at 2 weeks The time it took the trainee to reach the cecum, as auto-generated automatically by the colonoscopy simulator. This is reported in minutes and seconds (min:sec). The range from 0 to 20 minutes
Change in the Clarity of instruction (trainee's perception) Change from Baseline trainer's language assessment at 2 weeks The clarity of instruction will be rated by the trainee on a Likert scale, using linguistics specific metrics developed an expert in linguistics. Description-based scale with following categories- Excellent, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement and Not Acceptable.
This form will be provided to the trainees only to assess their perception of the instructions provided by the faculty instructor.Change in the trainer's language (assessed by linguistics expert) Change from Baseline trainer's language assessment at 2 weeks Based on the de-identified video recordings, the trainer's clarity of instructions and use of recommended language will be rated using specialized linguistic-designed assessment rubric by a blinded external linguistics expert.
Name of Measurement- Clarity of language and use of standardized terminology Measurement Tool- Linguistics rubric (descriptive rating scale, with following categories- Excellent, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement and Not Acceptable)Semi-structured interview of the faculty instructor At 2 weeks In order to explore faculty's perceptions of the training modality being tested, faculty participants will also be asked to participate in a separate 10-15 minute long semi-structured interview with the PI and/or co-PI, after completing the 2 simulation sessions with a trainee fellow. The interview guide has been adapted from a study exploring endoscopy trainers' experience in teaching endoscopy. Interview will be transcribed and coded qualitatively using a constant comparison approach to explore the faculty's perception of the instructional strategies.
Semi-structured interview of the trainees At 2 weeks In order to complement and enhance the data from above mentioned assessment tools (i.e., clarity of instruction, cognitive load), trainees will be asked to participate in a short 10-15 minute interview with the PI and/or Co-PI after the they have completed all 4 simulated cases, to explore their perceptions of instruction provided. The interview guide has been adapted from a study examining gastroenterology trainees' perception of endoscopy training activities. Interviews will be transcribed (removing any identifiers) and coded qualitatively using a constant comparison approach to compare differences in trainee's perceptions between groups
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UTSW
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
UTSW🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States