跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03618927
NCT03618927已完成不适用

A Program Evaluation of an In-school Daily Physical Activity Initiative for Children and Youth

McMaster University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 362 人开始时间: 2016年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
362
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in Physical Activity from baseline to 20-weeks

研究概览

简要总结

The school system is one setting in which children's physical activity levels may be increased through daily physical activity (DPA) policies and initiatives. Adherence to DPA policies is typically poor and results are limited in regard to the associated benefits for participating children. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate a range of psychosocial outcomes following a community-led, in-school DPA initiative for 9-14 year old children and youth. This program evaluation examined the impact of a DPA program consisting of 20 minutes of teacher-led DPA for 20 consecutive weeks. Student outcomes were measured using a questionnaire administered at three time points: baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. A teacher questionnaire regarding program adherence and student behaviour was completed at post-intervention.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
9 Years 至 14 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Participants will include males and females between the ages of 9-
  • •Participants must be enrolled in one of 30 elementary school classes across the participating seven elementary schools.
  • •Participants need to be able to read and write in English

排除标准

  • •Participants not enrolled in one of the participating classes.
  • •Unable to read and write in English.

研究组 & 干预措施

Daily physical activity intervention

Experimental

The intervention consisted of a DPA program designed by a national organization with expertise in school-based physical activity programming and delivered in school by teachers. The program was offered to students in grades 4 through 8 and consisted of 20 minutes of structured DPA in school for 20 consecutive weeks. The DPA activities included jumping jacks, squats, running and other body weight exercises.

干预措施: Daily physical activity intervention (Behavioral)

Control - treatment as usual

No Intervention

Participants in control classes completed regular school activities as per the Ontario curriculum.

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Physical Activity from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Assessed with the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C). The PAQ-C was designed for children in grades 4-8 who have recess as a regular part of their school week. The PAQ-C is a 9-item 7-day recall instrument that has been shown to have good psychometric properties. We omitted the first item from this questionnaire because it asked about the types of physical activity performed, and we were interested only in overall levels of participation. An example item is "In the last 7 days, what did you do most of the time at recess?" The items were averaged together to generate a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of participation in physical activity.

Change in Self-efficacy from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Self-efficacy for engaging in physical activity, sports, and active play was assessed using a three-item scale adhering to recommendations by Bandura for assessing self-efficacy. Each item was prefaced with the stem "I am confident in my ability to engage in..." The individual items were "Physical activity (e.g., running, yoga, skating)," "Sports (e.g., soccer, baseball, ultimate Frisbee)," and "Activity play (e.g., playing with friends at recess or after school)." Following guidelines provided by Bandura, participants rated their confidence for each item using an 11-point scale (0=not confident, 10=totally confident). A generalized task self-efficacy overall score was computed by averaging the ratings for each item to produce a scale value out of 10. Higher scores indicate more favorable self-efficacy.

Change in Sense of Belonging at School from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Measured using the 5-item short form version of the Sense of Belonging Scale. An example item is "I feel comfortable at my school." Two items were reverse scored, and the items were summed with higher scores indicating a greater sense of belonging at school.

Change in Commitment to School from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Assessed with 5 items drawn from the 10-item Commitment to School scale. The scale consists of 10-items scored on a four-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree). A subset of five-items was selected, scored on a five-point Likert-type ranging from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 5 (Really true for me). An example item is "You try really hard at school." The 5 items were summed with higher score indicating greater commitment to school.

Change in grit from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Assessed with the 8-item Short Grit Scale for Children. The items are scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Not at all like me) to 5 (Very much like me). An example item is "New ideas and projects sometimes distract me from previous ones." Items 1,3,5,6 were reversed scored and all items were summed with higher scores indicating better results.

Change in self-esteem from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. This is a 10-item measure that has shown to have good construct validity in children. The scale is scored on a four-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 3 (Strongly Agree). An example item is "On the whole, I am satisfied with myself." Items 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 are reverse scored. The scores for the 10 items are then summed, with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem.

Change in Global Happiness from baseline to 20-weeks

时间窗: Change from baseline to 20-weeks

Measured using the 4-item Subjective Happiness Scale. The scale is scored on a seven-point Likert-type scale. Each item has its own stem and anchors ranging from 1 to 7. An example item stem is "In general I consider myself..." with 1 anchored as Not a very happy person and 7 anchored as A very happy person. The scale has demonstrated good psychometric properties in children and adolescents. The sum of scores is divided by four with a higher score indicating a greater level of happiness.

次要结局

  • Intervention adherence(20-weeks)
  • Perceived student behavior(20-weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

John Cairney

Professor

University of Toronto

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验