MedPath

ENVELOP: Wound Care Following Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Pilonidal Sinus
Wound Healing
Registration Number
NCT06647290
Lead Sponsor
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
Brief Summary

This is a single-blinded, multicentre, prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing post-operative and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing application of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) after sinus tract excision as compared to excision and standard open wound care in chronic pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).

Detailed Description

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the skin and subcutaneous tissues arising from hair follicles in the natal cleft. The definitive aetiology of the condition is unknown, however, it is theorised that it is the result of either the obstruction and subsequent inflammation of hair follicles or secondary to hair penetrating through the skin into the subcutaneous tissue. This results in infection, abscess formation, chronic discharge and pain. PSD is a common condition affecting 26 per 10,000 population, with the prevalence reaching 1.1% in young adult males.

PSD causes a significant burden on healthcare services due to high rates of recurrence and readmission following surgery, together with negative impacts on patients' quality of life and self-image. An effective management strategy for the disease is necessary to ensure that post-operative outcomes are optimised and patient-reported outcomes are satisfactory in those whose PSD requires surgery.

The objective of this multicentre, national RCT is to prospectively investigate the effect of negative pressure wound therapy compared to leaving open with standard wound care on time to wound healing following surgical excision of chronic PSD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria

i) They are aged 18 years or older

ii) They are undergoing elective pilonidal sinus excision without primary closure

Exclusion Criteria

i) They are unable to adhere to protocol requirements e.g. questionnaire completion

ii) They are undergoing emergency drainage for a pilonidal abscess

iii) They are undergoing surgery for a pilonidal sinus disease in locations other than the natal cleft

iv) They have underlying osteomyelitis

v) They have underlying fistulating disease e.g. Crohn's

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to complete wound healing6 months post surgery

Number of days to complete epithelialisation or closure of the wound without any discharge, drainage, scab, and/or the requirement for further dressing. The quality of wound healing will be assessed using a validated patient and observer reported scar assessment tool-POSAS.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Health Economics evaluation of resource use and cost effectiveness using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy dressings6 Months

Investigating resource use and cost effectiveness of single-use, prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings for midline laparotomy wounds based on length of hospital stay and costs of dressings

Measure of post operative pain6 months post surgery

Pain measured by visual analogue pain scores which is a scale from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), between the NPWT and SWC Groups.

Measure of post operative complications6 months post surgery

Measure of post operative complications between the NPWT and SWC Groups

Measure of quality of life6 months post surgery

To compare quality-of-life differences between the two groups from the time of surgery until wound healing is achieved using the

To investigate resource use6 months post surgery

To investigate resource use and thereby cost effectiveness of NPWT versus standard wound care

To compare recurrence rates6 months post surgery

To compare the 6-month recurrence rates (recurrence being defined as the development of a new sinus or abscess within the natal cleft occurring after wound healing had been achieved) between the NPWT and SWC Groups

Health-related quality of life with the EuroQol-5 dimensions five level index questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)6 months

The questionnaire covers five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4) and extreme problems (5). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The raw scores are also converted to an EQ-5D index value using a scoring algorithm (British tariff) ranging from -0.594 (worst perceived health state) to 1.00 (best perceived health state)

Scar assessment - using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)6 months

The POSAS is made up of two scales: the patient scale and the observer scale; each of the six components is scored numerically on a scale of 1 to 10. The component scores are then added together; the worst scar would receive a score of 60, while the best scar would receive a score of 6

Health-related out-of- Pocket Costs assessed using the Costs for Patients Questionnaire (CoPaQ)6 Months

The CoPaQ measures patient and caregivers out-of-pocket expenses (direct and indirect) associated with a health condition

Visual pain score questionnaire3 Months

Measurement of pain intensity

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

Mayo University Hospital

🇮🇪

Castlebar, Ireland

University Hospital Cork

🇮🇪

Cork, Ireland

Beaumont Hospital

🇮🇪

Dublin, Ireland

St Michael's Hospital Dun Laoighre

🇮🇪

Dublin, Ireland

Tallaght University Hospital

🇮🇪

Dublin, Ireland

University Hospital Galway

🇮🇪

Galway, Ireland

St. Luke's Hospital

🇮🇪

Kilkenny, Ireland

University Hospital Limerick

🇮🇪

Limerick, Ireland

Midlands University Hospital

🇮🇪

Tullamore, Ireland

University Hospital Waterford

🇮🇪

Waterford, Ireland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath