MedPath

To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of "HG-102" With Botox® in the Improvement of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Glabellar Lines
Interventions
Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox]
Drug: Botulinum toxin type A injection [HG-102]
Registration Number
NCT04944953
Lead Sponsor
Hugel
Brief Summary

To compare the safety and efficacy of "HG-102" with Botox® in the improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

Detailed Description

Double-blinded, Randomized, Active control, Single center-designed, Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy for improvement of Glabellar Lines of "HG-102" compared to Botox® in subjects with moderate to severe Glabellar Lines

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
38
Inclusion Criteria
  • Men and women aged between 19 and 65 at screening visit.
  • Patients who voluntarily sign the informed consent.
  • Patients who can comply with the study procedures and visit schedule.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with infection, skin disorders, or scars at the glabellar region.
  • Patients with facial palsy or the symptoms of blepharoptosis.
  • Fertile women and men who have plans to conceive during pregnancy, breastfeeding and clinical trials or who do not agree to appropriate contraception.
  • Subjects who are not eligible for this study based on investigator's judgement.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Botulinum toxin type A(Botox®)Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox]Botulinum toxin type A(Botox®) 100 Unit
Botulinum toxin type A(HG-102)Botulinum toxin type A injection [HG-102]Botulinum toxin type A(HG-102) 100 Unit
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adverse event and adverse drug reaction incidence ratesBaseline to week 16
Clinically-relevant changes in vital signs, physical exam, and laboratory testing assessed by medical personnel16 weeks (during the clinical trial)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Physician's rating line severityBaseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest with Physician's rating line severity at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with investigator's photo assessmentBaseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest with investigator's photo assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessmentBaseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Improvement rate of glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

Changes in grade by physician's rating line severity for glabellar linesBaseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Changes in grade(range from 0(None) to 3(Severe)) by physician's rating line severity for glabellar lines at each visit compared to baseline

Subject's satisfaction rateBaseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16

Subject's satisfaction rate of improvement in glabellar lines at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection

The severity of pain evaluated by the subject's Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS)Baseline

The severity of pain evaluated by the subject's Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS) at immediately and about 30 minutes post injection (severity range is from 1(no pain) to 5(unbearable pain))

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Konkuk University Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath