To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of "HG-102" With Botox® in the Improvement of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines.
- Conditions
- Glabellar Lines
- Interventions
- Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox]Drug: Botulinum toxin type A injection [HG-102]
- Registration Number
- NCT04944953
- Lead Sponsor
- Hugel
- Brief Summary
To compare the safety and efficacy of "HG-102" with Botox® in the improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines.
- Detailed Description
Double-blinded, Randomized, Active control, Single center-designed, Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy for improvement of Glabellar Lines of "HG-102" compared to Botox® in subjects with moderate to severe Glabellar Lines
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 38
- Men and women aged between 19 and 65 at screening visit.
- Patients who voluntarily sign the informed consent.
- Patients who can comply with the study procedures and visit schedule.
- Patients with infection, skin disorders, or scars at the glabellar region.
- Patients with facial palsy or the symptoms of blepharoptosis.
- Fertile women and men who have plans to conceive during pregnancy, breastfeeding and clinical trials or who do not agree to appropriate contraception.
- Subjects who are not eligible for this study based on investigator's judgement.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Botulinum toxin type A(Botox®) Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection [Botox] Botulinum toxin type A(Botox®) 100 Unit Botulinum toxin type A(HG-102) Botulinum toxin type A injection [HG-102] Botulinum toxin type A(HG-102) 100 Unit
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse event and adverse drug reaction incidence rates Baseline to week 16 Clinically-relevant changes in vital signs, physical exam, and laboratory testing assessed by medical personnel 16 weeks (during the clinical trial)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Physician's rating line severity Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16 Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest with Physician's rating line severity at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with investigator's photo assessment Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16 Improvement rate of glabellar lines at rest with investigator's photo assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection
Responder rate of improvement in glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessment Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16 Improvement rate of glabellar lines with Subject's improvement assessment at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection
Changes in grade by physician's rating line severity for glabellar lines Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16 Changes in grade(range from 0(None) to 3(Severe)) by physician's rating line severity for glabellar lines at each visit compared to baseline
Subject's satisfaction rate Baseline to week 4, 8, 12, 16 Subject's satisfaction rate of improvement in glabellar lines at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks post injection
The severity of pain evaluated by the subject's Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS) Baseline The severity of pain evaluated by the subject's Simple Descriptive Scale (SDS) at immediately and about 30 minutes post injection (severity range is from 1(no pain) to 5(unbearable pain))
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Konkuk University Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Korea, Republic of