MedPath

Fluid Agitation Microbiologic Yield In Pleural Infection Feasibility Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pleural Infection
Interventions
Procedure: Agitated Pleural Fluid Thoracentesis
Registration Number
NCT05702580
Lead Sponsor
Alexandria University
Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the microbiologic diagnostic yield of pre-aspiration agitated pleural fluid versus that of conventionally aspirated fluid in pleural infection patients. The main question it aims to answer is, whether fluid agitation helps to increase the microbiological yield.

Detailed Description

In pleural infection, It is suggested that the bacteria being diagnostically targeted, might more likely be residing on the pleural surface with a better blood supply and nutrition rather than being planktonic in the acidic, glucose deficient pleural fluid. The investigators thus hypothesize that an agitation of the pleural fluid prior to sample aspiration would aid in achieving a better cellular representation of the pleural space. This could have the effect of washing bacterial cells off the pleural surface as well as moving sedimented cells in the aspirated sample. This study aims to investigate whether an increase in the microbiological yield for infected pleural fluid could be achieved by a pre-aspiration agitation of the pleural fluid which would have a positive effect on management and eventual patient outcomes. Adult participants with pleural infection will undergo thoracentesis via both the standard and agitated fluid techniques guided by thoracic ultrasound. Microbiological yields will be compared.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age >18 years old
  2. Pleural infection based on clinical presentation, imaging or laboratory investigations and pleural fluid examination showing glucose < 40 mg/dL or pH <7.2 with lower respiratory infection or pus on aspiration
  3. At least a moderate amount of pleural fluid collection (2 or more intercostal spaces on thoracic ultrasound)
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Minimal - mild pleural fluid deemed unsuitable for aspiration and agitation
  2. Hemodynamic instability
  3. Uncorrected coagulopathy
  4. Transudative or exudative lymphocytic pleural effusion on biochemical analysis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard thoracentesis followed by pre-aspiration fluid agitationAgitated Pleural Fluid ThoracentesisParticipants will undergo the standard thoracentesis followed by the experimental pre-aspiration fluid agitation technique
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic yield of the microbiologic analysisresults within 1 week of sampling

Percentage of samples with a positive microbiologic result among both aspiration techniques

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Protein level difference between both aspiration methodsresults within 1 day of sampling

Difference in protein levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques

Neutrophilic count difference between both aspiration methodsresults within 1 day of sampling

Difference in neutrophilic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques

Glucose level difference between both aspiration methodsresults within 1 day of sampling

Difference in glucose levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques

LDH level difference between both aspiration methodsresults within 1 day of sampling

Difference in LDH levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques

Lymphocytic count difference between both aspiration methodsresults within 1 day of sampling

Difference in lymphocytic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Chest Diseases Department, Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath