A prospective randomized study of right coronary artery catheter engagement: Williams versus Judkins
Completed
- Conditions
- atherosclerosiscoronary disease10011082
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON36261
- Lead Sponsor
- Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 110
Inclusion Criteria
Patients planned for coronary catheterization via the femoral artery for any reason.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients planned for coronary cathetrization via the brachial artery.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Time to engage the right coronary artery en the fluoroscopy time needed of the<br /><br>Williams catheter compared to the Judkins catheter.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Secondary end points will be dislocation of the catheter, technical success and<br /><br>image quality.</p><br>
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying Williams versus Judkins catheter engagement in right coronary artery procedures?
How does the Williams catheter compare to Judkins in terms of procedural success and complications in patients with atherosclerosis and coronary disease?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict optimal catheter selection for right coronary artery engagement in coronary artery disease?
What are the potential adverse events associated with Williams catheter use in right coronary artery procedures and how are they managed?
How do Williams catheter techniques compare to other coronary intervention approaches in treating atherosclerosis?