跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00696293
NCT00696293已完成4 期

Optimizing Outcomes in Older Adults With Low Back Pain and Depression

University of Pittsburgh1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2007年5月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) Score From Baseline and 12 Weeks

研究概览

简要总结

The following primary hypotheses will be tested:

  1. During Step 1: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) in < 40% of the initial 60 subjects treated with duloxetine (DUL) + Clinical Management(CM) during the first 8 weeks will respond (response is defined as a Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score </=9 and at least a 30% improvement in back pain as measured with the 20-point numeric rating scale.
  2. During Step 2: More DUL+Problem Solving Therapy for Depression and Pain (PST-DP) than DUL+CM treated subjects will achieve response during the second 8 weeks, defined as a MADRS score </=9 and at least a 30% improvement in back pain as measured with the 2-point numeric rating scale.
  3. Improvement in depression scores will be correlated with improvement in CLBP scores.

The exploratory hypotheses to be tested are that:

During Step 2: Compared to subjects treated with DUL+CM, subjects treated with DUL+PST-DP will have improved outcomes in: 1) disability, 2) sleep, 2) functioning/quality of life, 3) caregiver burden/depression, and 5) analgesic use.

详细描述

This is a two-part study. Step 1 is an 8-week long open-label trial of duloxetine (DUL) + clinical management (CM), titrated up to 90 mg/day, for older adults with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and chronic low back pain (CLBP). At week 8, if subjects have not responded, the dose of duloxetine is increased to 120 mg/day. Duloxetine will be increased and continued at 120 mg/day (or highest tolerated dose) for both randomized study groups (during step 2) to assure medication parity.

Step two starts at week 9 and includes those subjects whose MDD and/or CLBP has not met criteria for response during Step 1. At week 9 subjects will be randomized to receive treatment with either: 1) DUL 120 mg/day (or the highest tolerated dose)+ Problem Solving for Depression and Pain (PST-DP) or 2) DUL 120 mg/day (or highest tolerated dose) + CM. Step 2 will be delivered over the course of 8-10 sessions.

NOTE ADDED 1/5/16: THIS WAS TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT WORK CONDUCTED AS PART OF A CAREER DEVELOPMENT AWARD. ONLY THE FIRST OPEN-LABEL PART OF THE STUDY WAS COMPLETED, AND THESE RESULTS HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED AND WILL BE REPORTED HERE ON CLINICALTRIALS.GOV

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age >/= 60
  • Current episode of MDD per SCID DSM-IV criteria
  • Must score >/= 16 on the CES-D assessment
  • Serum sodium >/=130 mEq/ml
  • CLBP of at least moderate severity for more days than not for >/= 3 months
  • MADRS score >/= 15
  • Sufficiently medically stable to be able to participate in a depression treatment protocol
  • Willingness and ability to speak English Access to translators is limited. It would be unsafe to treat an older adult who does not speak English with an antidepressant and not be able to effectively communicate with them about their progress and any side effects. We provide a 24/7 on-call service for all subjects enrolled in this study. The on-call clinicians and physicians are not bilingual, and if a problem arose, it may be impossible to effectively interpret and manage the emergent situation. Finally, many of the assessments used in the study are self-reports. At the present time, we do not have the ability to translate these instruments into other languages. If the subject cannot read and understand English, this would interfere with their ability to complete the self-report assessments
  • Willingness to discontinue other antidepressants and anxiolytics, except for lorazepam up to 2 mg/day
  • Mini Mental State Exam > 20
  • Willingness to provide informed consent
  • Corrected visual ability that enables reading of newspaper headlines and hearing capacity that is adequate to respond to a raised conversational voice.

排除标准

  • Meet DSM-IV criteria for dementia
  • History of bipolar, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or other psychotic disorder
  • Alcohol or other drug abuse (including abuse of prescription medications) within the past 6 months
  • History of treatment non-adherence in other protocols run by the Mid-Life or Late-Life Centers
  • Acute pain superimposed on chronic pain. For example, subjects who report "red flags" which suggest a herniated disk, vertebral fracture, infection, cauda equina syndrome, or other medical emergency will be excluded
  • Wheelchair bound
  • History of documented non-response to duloxetine
  • Concurrent use of thioridazine
  • Active suicidal ideation with plan
  • Uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma

研究组 & 干预措施

1

Experimental

Duloxetine + clinical management

NOTE -- THIS WORK WAS CONDUCTED AS PART OF A CAREER DEVELOPMENT AWARD. THE CLINICALTRIALS.GOV DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY WAS UPDATED 1/5/16 TO UPDATE THE OPEN LABEL NATURE OF THIS WORK. THIS IS WHAT IS REPORTED HERE AND HAS BEEN PEER REVIEWED AND PUBLISHED.

干预措施: Duloxetine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS) Score From Baseline and 12 Weeks

时间窗: baseline and 12 weeks

The MADRS is a rating of depression severity with theoretical scale range 0-60, with lower values representing better outcome Larger reduction between MADRS from baseline to 12 weeks would represent better outcome

Change in McGill Pain Questionaire, Short Form, Score From Baseline and 12 Weeks

时间窗: Baseline and 12 weeks

The McGill Pain Questionaire, short form consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. The McGill Pain Questionaire score ranged from 0 (none) to 45 (severe). A larger reduction of the score from baseline to 12 weeks would represent a better outcome

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jordan F. Karp

Associate professor

University of Pittsburgh

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验