SUPERa Stenting After SUBintimal Crossing of TASC C-D Femoro-popliteal Lesions in CLI Patients
- Conditions
- PAD
- Registration Number
- NCT03452293
- Lead Sponsor
- EndoCore Lab s.r.l.
- Brief Summary
The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of subintimal Supera stenting in complex de novo or re-occlusive CTO (TASC C-D) lesions in patients with CLI. This study will be performed based on a rigorous sample size calculation, which will allow us to have the statistical power to validate our conclusions and therefore establish the generalizability of this strategy.
- Detailed Description
The present study is designed as a prospective, open label, observational study.
The study will collect information about the medical care patients receive during their planned procedure. No additional testing or procedures will be done.
Patients elected for endovascular revascularization with SuperSub strategy will be asked their written consent to the use of their personal data.
Revascularization will be performed as per standard procedure of the sites. After discharge all patients will attend clinic visits at 30 days (±14 days), 6 months (±30 days), 12 months (±30 days) and 24 months (±30 days). Angiographic follow-up will be performed only in symptomatic patients, as clinically indicated and with the aim for a new treatment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 92
General Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with CLI and TASC C-D Fem-Pop CTO's
- Age ≥18 years
- Patient has signed an approved consent form
- Patients without previous stenting of the Fem-Pop segment
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
- Patent and hemodynamically normal iliac and common femoral arteries.
- At least one patent and healthy tibial vessel runoff to the foot.
- Patient has documented TASC C or D Fem-Pop CTO's prior to the study procedure
- Rutherford Category 4, 5 or 6
- Subintimal crossing of the occluded Fem-Pop vessels
- Supera Stenting From healthy to healthy arterial segment.
- Patient unwilling or unlikely to comply with Follow-Up schedule
- Endoluminal crossing of the CTO
- Inability to stent from "healthy to healthy" arterial segments.
- Inability to re-enter within the pre-specified Ideal Landing Zone (IDL)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary Patency Rate 24 months Primary Patency is defined as freedom from clinically driven TLR (CD-TLR) defined as repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass graft to treat an angiographic significant restenosis (\>50%) at the level of the treated lesion ±10 mm (proximally and/or distally)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Stent integrity assessment 24 months Stent integrity assessment will be evaluated with two oblique opposite projection X-ray images
Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement 6,12 and 24 months vs baseline Clinical Improvement as assessed by Rutherford Class changes
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire) 24 months Quality of Life improvement as assessed by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Parameters \[Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression\] Values \[(1) No Problems, (2) Slight Problems, (3) Moderate Problems, (4) Severe Problems, (5) Unable to\] Value 1 - Best score, Value 5 - Worse Score
Incidence of Major Adverse Events 24 months Incidence of Major Adverse Events
Quality of Life improvement (SF12 Questionnaire) 12 months Quality of Life improvement as assessed by SF12 Questionnaire Parameters \[Overall Health, Physical health, Role and Physical health, Role and Mental health, Mental health\] Values for Overall Health \[ 1-Excellent, 2- Very Good, 3-Good, 4-Acceptable, 5-Poor\] Values for Role and Physical health \[ 1-Very limiting, 2-Partially limiting, 3-Not limiting\] Values for Physical health \[ 1-yes, 2-no\], \[1- best score\] , \[2-worse score\] Values for Role and Mental health \[ 1-yes, 2-no\], \[1- best score\] , \[2-worse score\] Values for Mental Health \[ 1-Excellent, 2- Very Good, 3-Good, 4-Acceptable, 5-Poor\]
Quality of Life improvement 24 months Quality of Life improvement as assessed by SF12 Questionnaire Parameters \[Overall Health, Physical health, Role and Physical health, Role and Mental health, Mental health\] Values for Overall Health \[ 1-Excellent, 2- Very Good, 3-Good, 4-Acceptable, 5-Poor\] Values for Role and Physical health \[ 1-Very limiting, 2-Partially limiting, 3-Not limiting\] Values for Physical health \[ 1-yes, 2-no\], \[1- best score\] , \[2-worse score\] Values for Role and Mental health \[ 1-yes, 2-no\], \[1- best score\] , \[2-worse score\] Values for Mental Health \[ 1-Excellent, 2- Very Good, 3-Good, 4-Acceptable, 5-Poor\]
Amputation Rates 24 months Major and Minor amputations
Freedom from Restenosis 24 months Freedom from restenosis (diameter stenosis \> 50%, determined by peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) \>2.4 by duplex ultrasonography)
Composite of All Major Adverse Events 24 Months Incidence of the composite of all Major Adverse Events
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (15)
Instituto Medico CENICLAR, Unidad Sanatorio de la Mujer
🇦🇷Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
Metro Health Hospital
🇺🇸Wyoming, Michigan, United States
Clinica San Michele
🇮🇹Maddaloni, CE, Italy
Ospedale di Avezzano
🇮🇹Avezzano, AQ, Italy
A.O.U. Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
🇮🇹Catania, CT, Italy
A.O. Cardinale Panico
🇮🇹Tricase, LE, Italy
Casa di Cura Abano Terme
🇮🇹Abano Terme, Padova, Italy
A.O.U. Santa Maria della Misericordia
🇮🇹Perugia, PG, Italy
Policlinico Tor Vergata
🇮🇹Roma, RM, Italy
A.O. San Giovanni Addolorata
🇮🇹Roma, RM, Italy
Ospedale San Antonio Abate
🇮🇹Erice, TP, Italy
A.O.U. di Sassari
🇮🇹Sassari, SS, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni
🇮🇹Terni, TR, Italy
AORN Antonio Cardarelli
🇮🇹Napoli, Italy
London North West HealthCare NHS Trust
🇬🇧London, England, United Kingdom