MedPath

Materiovigilance After Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse Surgery

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Urinary Stress Incontinence
Rectal Prolapse
Registration Number
NCT03052985
Lead Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
Brief Summary

Observatory of Materiovigilance After Surgery of Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse in Women Implantable medical devices (meshes) used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (genital prolapse, rectal prolapse), or incontinence surgery may be source of severe complications.

Detailed Description

RATIONAL Implantable medical devices (meshes) used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (genital prolapse, rectal prolapse), or incontinence surgery may be source of severe complications.

MAIN OBJECTIVE Estimate the incidence of severe complications during or after surgery of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse in adult women depending on the type of surgery performed.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Estimate the incidence of severe complications after urinary incontinence or prolapse surgery as a function of time since surgery.

Compare the incidence rates of severe complications considering the type of procedure (with or without mesh, vaginal or laparoscopic, etc.), comorbidities, mesh type, surgeon experience, and surgical volume centre.

Report the health and satisfaction of operated women. Estimate the risk of revision surgery for failure or recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME Per- and post-operative complications (less than 12 months after surgery), or late (after 12 months) severe (grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification)

OTHER OUTCOMES Time lapse of occurrence of severe complications Surgical recovery for failure or recurrence Health and perceived improvement (OMS, EQ5D, an PGI-I questionnaires)

DESIGN Prospective multicentre cohort allowing the constitution and analysis of an observatory off surgery for genital prolapse, rectal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence in women.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

* Operated for urinary incontinence, genital prolapse, or rectal prolapse in one of the centres participating in the observatory

* 18 years old or more.

SUBJECTS NUMBER Estimated at 3000 per year during 5 years in 18 participating centres

STUDY LENGTH Duration of the inclusion period: 2 years with the initial grant from ANSM (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé, French Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency), after new funding by ANSM 5 years of inclusion in total.

Duration of participation of subjects: 2 years with grant from ANSM, after the new funding by ANSM 10 years.

Total duration of the study: 3 years with the grant from ANSM, 15 years with the new funding.

ANALYSIS PLANNED The one-year analysis will be based on multivariate logistic regression analysis (considering confounding factors). The 10-year (or intermediate-term) analysis will use survival analysis methods to account for delays in complications: Kaplan-Meier curves; Model of Cox proportional hazards.

PERSPECTIVES The observatory should make it possible to precise the tolerance and the short- and long-term consequences of the use of these implantable devices (meshes) in pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence surgery in women and to specify the risk factors for severe complications.

The observatory will enable to make comparisons between the different types of meshes and different surgical procedures, and to identify those that may present problems.

Clinical practice recommendations may be issued as well as standards for marketing.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
19000
Inclusion Criteria
  • Operated for urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or rectal prolapse in one of the centres participating in the observatory
  • 18 years old or more.
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of severe complications10 years

Grade III or more according to Clavien-Dindo classification

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surgical recovery for failure or recurrence10 years

Number participent with new revision surgery for failure Number participent with new revision surgery for recurrence

Time lapse of occurrence of severe complications10 years
Health and perceived improvement10 years

PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1. Very much better to 7. Very much worse.

Trial Locations

Locations (31)

CHRU de Besançon

🇫🇷

Besançon, France

CHU Lille

🇫🇷

Lille, France

Hospices Civils de Lyon

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

CHU de Limoges

🇫🇷

Limoges, France

CHU Strasbourg

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

Clinique UROVAR

🇫🇷

Toulon, France

Centre l'Avancée - Clinique Axium

🇫🇷

Aix-en-Provence, France

C.H.U. d'Angers

🇫🇷

Angers, France

Centre Hospitalier de Béthune

🇫🇷

Béthune, France

CHU Caen

🇫🇷

Caen, France

CHU de Bordeaux

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque

🇫🇷

Dunkerque, France

Polyclinique d'Hénin-Beaumont

🇫🇷

Hénin-Beaumont, France

Hôpital St Vincent De Paul

🇫🇷

Lille, France

Centre Hospitalier Camille Guérin

🇫🇷

Châtellerault, France

Hôpital Antoine-Béclère

🇫🇷

Clamart, France

Hopital La Rochelle- Ré- Aunis

🇫🇷

La Rochelle, France

CHU Nantes

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

CHRU Carémeau

🇫🇷

Nîmes, France

Chu Estaing

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Clinique BEAUSOLEIL

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

CHRU de NANCY

🇫🇷

Nancy, France

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Centre briochin d'Urologie

🇫🇷

Plérin, France

CHI Poissy-St-Germain

🇫🇷

Poissy, France

CHU de Poitiers

🇫🇷

Poitiers, France

Hopital Foch

🇫🇷

Suresnes, France

CHU de Toulouse

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

CHU de Reims

🇫🇷

Reims, France

Hôpital Bichat

🇫🇷

Paris, France

La Pitié-Salpêtrière

🇫🇷

Paris, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath