MedPath

Choir Singing in Aphasia Rehabilitation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Aphasia
Stroke
Interventions
Behavioral: Singing-based rehabilitation
Other: Standard care
Registration Number
NCT03501797
Lead Sponsor
University of Helsinki
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the verbal, cognitive, emotional, and neural efficacy of a choir singing intervention in chronic aphasic patients and their caregivers. Using a cross-over RCT design, half of the participants receive a 4-month singing intervention during the first half of the study and half of the participants during the second half of the study.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Singing is a highly stimulating and versatile activity for the brain, combining vocal-motor, auditory, linguistic, cognitive, emotional, and social brain processes, both in the left and right hemisphere. The capacity to sing is often preserved in aphasia after stroke, and singing-based methods, such as Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT), can be effective in rehabilitating speech production in aphasics. Also emotionally and socially, singing could provide a powerful alternative channel for aphasic patients to express their emotions and interact with others, but the communal or group-level use of singing in aphasia rehabilitation has not been systematically studied.

AIMS: The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical and neural efficacy of a novel choir singing intervention in subacute/chronic aphasia. Specifically, the targeted outcomes are (i) verbal and vocal-motor skills, (ii) cognitive skills, (iii) emotional functioning and quality of life, (iv) caregiver psychological well-being, and (v) structural and functional neuroplasticity. In addition, the capacity of singing and music learning in aphasia is explored.

METHODS: Subjects are 60 stroke patients with at least minor aphasia (≥ 6 months post-stroke) and their family members (FMs, N = 60) from Helsinki area recruited to a cross-over RCT study. Participants are randomized to two groups \[N = 60 in both (30 patients, 30 FMs)\], which receive a 16-week choir intervention either during the first (AB group) or second (BA group) half of the follow-up. The intervention is a combination of group training, which utilizes a novel combination of traditional senior choir singing and MIT-like speech training protocols, and home training in which the choir material is trained with a tablet computer. All patients are evaluated at baseline, 5-month, and 9-month stages with language, cognitive, and auditory-music tests and questionnaires. Half of the patients (N = 30) also undergo electroencephalography (EEG) and structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (s/fMRI). FMs are evaluated with questionnaires.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Late singing intervention (BA)Standard careParticipants receive a 16 weeks of SC only followed by 16 weeks of singing intervention and SC.
Early singing intervention (AB)Singing-based rehabilitationParticipants receive a 16 weeks of singing-based rehabilitation and standard care (SC) followed by 16 weeks of SC only.
Early singing intervention (AB)Standard careParticipants receive a 16 weeks of singing-based rehabilitation and standard care (SC) followed by 16 weeks of SC only.
Late singing intervention (BA)Singing-based rehabilitationParticipants receive a 16 weeks of SC only followed by 16 weeks of singing intervention and SC.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Verbal agilityChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Verbal Agility subtest score of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examinaton (BDAE) (range 0-14, higher score indicates better outcome)

Verbal comprehensionChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Sequential Commands subtest score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-80, higher score indicates better outcome)

Connected speech informativenessChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Percentage of correct information units (CIUs) produced in a picture description task

Communication abilityChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the Communication Action Log (CAL) questionnaire (range 0-180, higher score indicates better outcome)

Repetition of words and sentencesChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Repetition subscale score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcome)

Spontaneous speech productionChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Spontaneous Speech subscale score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-20, higher score indicates better outcome)

Naming and word findingChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Naming and Word Finding subscale score of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcome)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Executive function (correct responses)Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Simon Task: score (range 0-100, higher score indicates better outcome)

Attention (reaction times)Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Flexible Attention Test (FAT): reaction time mean (ms)

Verbal learningChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Word Lists subtest score of the Wechsler Memory Scale III (WMS-III) (range 0-84, higher score indicates better outcome)

Psychological stress of the caregiverChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) (range 0-36, lower score indicates better outcome)

Electroencephalography (EEG)Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Amplitude and latency of event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with learning and memory in two auditory tasks

Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI): DTI sequenceChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Structural connectivity of intra- and interhemispheric white matter tracts

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): resting-stateChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

resting-state fMRI sequence: functional connectivity of frontotemporal, frontoparietal, and limbic brain networks

Verbal memoryChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Logical Memory subtest score of the Wechsler Memory Scale III (WMS-III) (range 0-80, higher score indicates better outcome)

Music perceptionChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA) score (range 0-30, higher score indicates better outcome)

DepressionChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) questionnaire (range 0-60, lower score indicates better outcome)

Caregiver burdenChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-22) questionnaire (range 0-88, lower score indicates better outcome)

Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI): MPRAGE sequenceChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Grey matter volume in frontotemporal, frontoparietal, and limbic brain regions

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): singing-related activityChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

task-based fMRI sequence: frontotemporal, frontoparietal, and limbic activation patterns associated with the perception, vocal repetition, and recall of novel songs

Executive function (reaction times)Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Simon Task: reaction time mean (ms)

Attention (correct responses)Change from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Flexible Attention Test (FAT): score (range 0-48, higher score indicates better outcome)

Functional stroke recoveryChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) questionnaire (range 0-900, higher score indicates better outcome)

Social interactionChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the Social Provision Scale (SPS) questionnaire (range 24-96, higher score indicates better outcome)

Working memoryChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Word Span subtest score of the Kielelliset Arviointitehtävät (KAT) (range 0-30, higher score indicates better outcome)

Singing abilityChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Acoustic features (e.g., pitch, rhythm, intensity) analyzed from recorded production of familiar and novel songs using acoustic analysis software

MoodChange from baseline at 5 months and 9 months

Total score of the Visual Analog Mood Scales (VAMS) questionnaire (range 0-800, higher score indicates better outcome)

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Helsinki-Uusimaa Aphasia and Stroke Association

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Unit

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath