CTRI/2016/12/007609已完成未知
Comparative evaluation of the TruView PCD and C-MAC infant video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways: A prospective randomized study
Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalya0 个研究点目标入组 80 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •ASA Grade â?? I/II infants (less than 1 year) of either sex admitted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation
排除标准
- •Patients with an ASA physical status greater than Grade II, features suggestive of increased intracranial pressure, increased risk for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents, known coagulopathy and any pathology of the head and neck will be excluded.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of use of three different laryngoscopes in childreCTRI/2012/09/003011ady Hardinge Medical College and ASSOC HOSPITALS150
已完成
不适用
Method Evaluation Study of Truview Picture Capture Device(PCD) Versus MacIntosh LaryngoscopeIntubationNCT01530152Aalborg University Hospital56
招募中
4 期
Comparison of C-MAC D-Blade and Airtraq Video laryngoscope(2 different devices) for putting tube in trachea for giving anaesthesia after applying cervical collarCTRI/2021/10/037394Intramural Grant AIIMS
尚未招募
2 期
COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO VIDEO ASSISTED DEVICES USED FOR GIVING GENERAL ANESTHESIACTRI/2022/12/048253GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE AMRITSAR
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison between 2 different video laryngoscope blades.CTRI/2021/06/034094Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Pondicherry