comparison of two types of laryngoscope blades for intubation under anesthesia in infants
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- 60 ASA Grade â?? I/II infants (less than 1 year) of either sex admitted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubationHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2016/12/007609
- Lead Sponsor
- Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalya
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 80
Inclusion Criteria
ASA Grade â?? I/II infants (less than 1 year) of either sex admitted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with an ASA physical status greater than Grade II, features suggestive of increased intracranial pressure, increased risk for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents, known coagulopathy and any pathology of the head and neck will be excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the time required for intubation with CMAC videolaryngosocpe and Truview PCD videolaryngoscope for intubation in infantsTimepoint: time to intubation will be recorded once
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method first attempt and overall success rate, number of attempts for intubation, the glottis views using Cormack Lehane grading system <br/ ><br>Timepoint: during intubation period